Skip to main content

Comparison of scandium-44 g with other PET radionuclides in pre-clinical PET phantom imaging



The decay characteristics of radionuclides in PET studies can impact image reconstruction. 44gSc has been the topic of recent research due to potential theranostic applications and is a promising radiometal for PET imaging. In this study, the reconstructed images from phantom measurements with scandium in a small-animal PET scanner are compared with 18F and two prominent radiometals: 64Cu and 68Ga


Three phantoms filled with 18F, 64C, 68Ga, and 44gSc were imaged in the Siemens Inveon PET scanner. The NEMA image quality phantom was used to determine the recovery coefficients (RCs), spill-over ratios (SORs), and noise (%SD) under typical pre-clinical imaging conditions. Image contrast was determined using a Derenzo phantom, while the coincidence characteristics were investigated using an NEC phantom. Three reconstruction algorithms were used, namely filtered back projection (FBP), ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), and maximum a-posteriori (MAP).


Image quality parameters were measured for 18F, 64Cu, 68Ga, and 44gSc respectively; using FBP, the %SD are 5.65, 5.88, 7.28, and 7.70; the RCs for the 5-mm rod are 0.849, 1.01, 0.615, and 0.825; the SORs in water are 0.0473, 0.0595, 0.141, 0.0923; and the SORs in air are 0.0589, 0.0484, 0.0525, and 0.0509. The contrast measured in the 2.5-mm rods are 0.674, 0.637, 0.196, and 0.347. The NEC rate with 44gSc increased at a slower rate than 18F and 68Ga as a function of activity in the field of view.


44gSc demonstrates intermediate behavior relative to 18F and 68Ga with regard to RC and contrast measurements. It is a promising radionuclide for preclinical imaging.


The physical properties of the radionuclide used in a PET study affect the quality of the reconstructed image and the quantification of reconstructed activity. The positron energy spectrum of the radionuclide determines the positron range. The positron range is one of the dominant factors affecting resolution, and this is especially pronounced in pre-clinical scanners with smaller crystal sizes [1, 2]. There have been many experimental and Monte Carlo studies investigating the positron range of radionuclides in various media [3,4,5,6,7]. Techniques for correcting the blurring caused by the positron range have been proposed [8, 9].

Some newly proposed radionuclides possess high-energy co-emitted gammas (i.e., prompt gammas) which negatively interfere with the detection of positron annihilation photon pairs [10]; added image noise, owing to the increased the rate of spurious coincidences, has been reported [11, 12] and is not directly accounted for in conventional PET corrections. The prompt gammas are often of different energy and therefore possess different scatter and detection kernels. Prompt gamma corrections have been proposed to increase the accuracy of quantitative imaging, but are often radionuclide specific and require further investigation before being applied to novel radionuclides [13,14,15,16,17,18,19].

44gSc is of particular interest in PET imaging, and more broadly for theranostic applications in conjunction with 47Sc [20,21,22,23]. 44gSc can be cheaply produced in high yields on low-energy cyclotrons through the proton irradiation of natural calcium or enriched 44Ca targets [24, 25]. 44gSc can also be obtained through the decay of 44Ti; there have been initial developments into 44Ti/44gSc generator systems [26,27,28]. Wider availability of the radionuclide has led to more radiolabelling and imaging studies [29,30,31,32,33]. However, the image quality and quantitative accuracy of 44gSc needs to be investigated rigorously to determine its clinical relevancy with respect to other potential radiometals used for PET imaging.

Phantom imaging is a useful tool for comparing radionuclide performance under similar imaging conditions [34]. Thus far, phantom imaging with 44gSc has been mainly limited to Derenzo phantoms. A radionuclide comparison in a Derenzo phantom was first reported by Bunka et al. comparing the relative spatial resolution of 68Ga, 44gSc, 89Zr, 11C, 64Cu, and 18F [35]. Domnanich et al. later expanded on this study by comparing the resolution of Derenzo phantom images for 44gSc and 43Sc obtained in different ratios through different production routes, such as the proton irradiation of enriched 46Ti and 43Ca [36].

While spatial resolution as a function radionuclide is of interest, other performance metrics also necessitate quantification when evaluating new imaging radionuclides [37]. The NEMA guidelines have provided a standardized procedure for evaluating the performance of small-animal PET scanners (NEMA NU4-2008). These same procedures might be used to compare image parameters between different radionuclides on the same scanner; this was done by Disselhorst et al. to compare the recovery coefficients and spill-over ratios for 18F, 68Ga, 124I, and 89Zr [38].

In this study, the imaging properties of 44gSc are further assessed through phantom imaging in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner; this includes measurements of noise (%SD) and activity quantification (recovery coefficient (RC), spill-over ratio (SOR)) that were not previously determined. Three different phantoms are used to acquire relevant measurements. In addition, all quantitative parameters evaluated for 44gSc were also measured for 18F, the most common PET radionuclide, as well as the two widely used PET radiometals 68Ga and 64Cu to allow intercomparison of all radionuclides.

Materials and methods


Four radionuclides were used in this comparison study: 18F, the most commonly used PET radionuclide, and three radiometals, 68Ga, 44gSc, and 64Cu.

Fluorine-18: The radiofluorine was produced locally at the Cross Cancer Institute (CCI) from enriched 18O water. With a half-life of 109.8 min, 18F is a pure, low-energy positron emitter, with an average and maximum energy of emission of 249.8 keV and 633.5 keV respectively (96.7% abundance).

Copper-64: Radiocopper was produced at Washington University in St. Louis, USA, and shipped to the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada. 64Cu has a 12.7 h half-life and decays through both β− (38.5 %) and β+ (17.6 %) decay. The positron is emitted with an average and endpoint energy of 278.2 and 653.0 keV respectively.

Gallium-68: Radiogallium was obtained from a 68Ge/68Ga generator (iThemba Laboratories, Sommerset West, South Africa). 68Ga decays with the shortest half-life of the radionuclides in this study, at 67.71 min. On the other hand, it emits the positron with the greatest average and endpoint energies, at 836.0 and 1890 keV respectively with 87.7% abundance and a total positron branching ratio of 88.8%. An additional 1077 keV gamma is emitted with 3.22% of decays.

Scandium-44 g: 44gSc has a 3.97 h half-life and emits a 1157 keV gamma (99.9% abundance) in addition to a positron (94.27% abundance) with an average and maximum energy of 632.0 and 1474 keV respectively. The radioscandium was produced locally at the CCI through the irradiation of natural calcium with 16 MeV protons. The radionuclidic purity is reported in Table 1.

Table 1 Radioisotopic composition of radioscandium from the irradiation of natural calcium targets with 16 MeV protons

Image acquisition

The Siemens Inveon PET platform was used to perform imaging experiments. Its detector consists of lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO) crystals coupled through a light-guide to position sensitive photo-multiplier tubes. The LSO crystals are arranged in 16 detector blocks, each with 4 detectors axially which are divided into 20 × 20 crystal arrays. The ring diameter is 16.1 cm and the axial length 12.7 cm, with individual crystal sizes of 1.5 × 1.5 × 10 mm3. For the acquisitions, an energy window of 350–650 keV and a coincidence timing window of 3.432 μs were used.

Prior to injection into the phantoms, the radionuclide activity was measured in an Atomlab 400 dose calibrator (Biodex Medical Systems, NY, USA). Emission data was acquired in list mode, and the Inveon Acquisition Workplace (v. was used to bin the data into sinograms and reconstruct the images. Images were reconstructed with three image reconstruction procedures available, using the default parameters. The reconstruction procedures were 2D FBP (Fourier rebinning, Nyquist cut-off 0.5), OSEM3D-MAP (2 OSEM3D iterations, 18 MAP iterations, 1.5-mm requested resolution), and OSEM2D (4 iterations).

Image noise, spill-over ratio, and recovery coefficient

As the quality of reconstructed images can vary under different imaging situations, the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) has provided a standard for acquiring and evaluating the data equivalent to a full-body scan of a rodent with cold and hot regions (NEMA NU 4-2008). A NEMA image quality phantom consists of a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cylinder with three distinct sections, as outlined in Fig. 1, with the fillable activity hashed in blue.

Fig. 1

Cross-sections of the NEMA image quality phantom with dimensions in mm. Left: axial cross-section. Right: transverse cross-sections of the three different regions. The grey area represents the PMMA phantom; the dark blue hashed region represents the volume filled with activity, and the light blue represents the cold air and water volumes

The NEMA guidelines state that measurements should be performed with a total activity of 3.7 MBq ± 5% of 18F and counts acquired over 1200 s. To compare standard metrics for different radionuclides, modifications to this procedure must be made. The number of positron decays for a given activity and time is affected by the radionuclide’s half-life and positron branching ratio. The approach taken in this study is to keep the starting activity 3.7 MBq and modify the acquisition time in order to achieve the same number of positron decays as 18F in 1200 s. Table 2 lists the number of positron decays for a 3.7 MBq source of each different radionuclide, as well as the acquisition time used to obtain the same number of counts as 18F in the guideline conditions.

Table 2 Number of decays expected in standard scan conditions and time used to acquire an equal amount of positron decays for each radionuclide.

After the emission acquisition, a 30-min transmission scan was acquired with a 57Co point source and used for attenuation correction. The reconstructed transmission image was segmented into five materials: background (0.00 cm−1), animal bed (0.0150 cm−1), water (0.095 cm−1), bone (0.1780 cm−1), and aluminum (0.22 cm−1).

To measure uniformity, the central uniform region of the phantom was contoured. A 22.5 mm diameter (75% of active diameter) and 10-mm-long cylindrical VOI were drawn, and the mean (Cuniform), maximum and minimum values were recorded, while the percent standard deviation (σuniform) was calculated.

The hot rod region was used to measure the recovery coefficient. The central 10 mm length of the rods were averaged, circular ROIs twice the size of each rod drawn, and the pixel with the maximum value in each ROI was found. This transverse pixel was used in an axial profile over the 10 mm to determine for each rod the mean (Crod) and standard deviation (σrod). The recovery coefficient (RC) is the ratio of the mean value of the rods to that of the uniform region, while the uncertainty (σRC) is calculated using the standard deviation.

$$ RC=\frac{C_{\mathrm{rod}}}{C_{\mathrm{uniform}}}\kern1em \mathrm{and}\kern1em {\sigma}_{RC}=100\ast \sqrt{{\left(\frac{ST{D}_{rod}}{C_{rod}}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{ST{D}_{\mathrm{uniform}}}{C_{\mathrm{uniform}}}\right)}^2} $$

Finally, the spill-over ratio (SOR) in air and water was measured using a 4 mm diameter (50% of cylinder diameter) and 7.5-mm-long cylindrical volume for interest in the water- and air-filled inserts. The mean activity (Ccold) and standard deviation (STDcold) were calculated in each ROI; the SOR is the ratio of the mean value in the inserts to the mean value of the uniform region, while the uncertainty (σSOR) is calculated using the standard deviation.

$$ SOR=\frac{{\mathrm{C}}_{\mathrm{cold}}\ }{C_{\mathrm{uniform}}}\kern1em \mathrm{and}\kern1em {\sigma}_{SOR}=100\ast \sqrt{{\left(\frac{ST{D}_{cold}}{C_{cold}}\right)}^2+{\left(\frac{ST{D}_{uniform}}{C_{uniform}}\right)}^2} $$

Contrast and feature size

Regions of interest in pre-clinical scans can vary in size; many image quality models relate contrast to feature size and signal-to-noise ratio. It is important to understand the relationship between contrast and feature size because radionuclide properties, such as the positron energy spectrum, can affect lesion visibility and quantification. The Derenzo phantom is commonly used to quantify the trade-off between image contrast and visibility of small features. It is constructed from PMMA and contains triangular arrangements of hollow rods which can be filled with radioactivity. Each of the six sections contains rods of a given diameter (2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.25, 1.0, and 0.8 mm), and each rod is separated from its nearest neighbors by twice its diameter (center-to-center distance) as outlined in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phantom cross-sections with dimensions in mm. Left: cross-section of the Derenzo phantom with the fillable rod diameters. Right: NEC phantom cross-section

A large number of coincidences (greater than 5 × 107) were acquired for each radionuclide in the Derenzo phantom, and the images were reconstructed with attenuation correction and a final reconstructed pixel size of 0.388 mm (zoom 2). A transverse slice was used to determine the contrast in each triangular region. A profile was drawn between the central pixels of the center-most rod and an outer rod. The peak (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) values of this profile were utilized to calculate image contrast (C):

$$ C=\frac{C_{\mathrm{max}}-{C}_{\mathrm{min}}\ }{C_{\mathrm{max}}+{C}_{\mathrm{min}}} $$

Coincidence characteristics

Scanner performance is affected by the amount of radioactivity and geometry of the object in the scanner’s field of view. Count losses occur as a result of camera dead time, decreasing the scanner’s counting rate capability. Additionally, some scanners manifest a difference in sensitivity to scattered and primary radiation [39]. In this study, following NEMA NU 4-2008, these effects are investigated for each radionuclide using a “rat”-sized phantom made of high-density polyethylene (density 0.96 ± 0.1 g/cm3) with 50 ± 0.5 mm diameter and a length of 150 ± 0.5 mm. A 3.2 mm diameter hole 17.5 mm from the center extends through the length of the phantom, through which a 140-mm line source containing the radionuclide of interest is inserted.

For this study, sources of 18F, 44gSc, and 68Ga with activities greater than 100 MBq were placed in the phantom which was centered in the field of view, and counts were acquired over several half-lives as the radionuclides decayed. This study was not performed with 64Cu due to the low branching ratio and long half-life; the activity required to observe count rates similar to the other radionuclides would be significantly larger (5.5 times the activity of 18F to achieve the same amount of emitted positrons) and the acquisition time would greatly increase (greater than 3 days to decay from 100 to 1.5 MBq). Prior to binning into sinograms, the list-mode data was separated into 15-min time frames for 18F and 68Ga, and 30 min time frames for 44gSc. These durations were chosen to be less than a quarter of each radionuclide’s half-life.

Single-slice rebinning was used to collapse oblique sinograms into single sinograms for each slice, with a span of 79 and ring difference of 39. No corrections were applied to the acquired counts, and the random coincidences were estimated in a separate sinogram. True (RT), random (RR), and scatter (RS) event rates, as prescribed by NEMA NU-4, were used to calculate the noise equivalent count rate, NECR, using:

$$ NECR=\frac{R_T^2}{R_T+{R}_S+{R}_R} $$

The NECR is the true count rate that would lead to the same amount of noise due to counting statistics in the absence of scattered and random coincidences


Measured results for each parameter are discussed below; summary of key numeric values for each parameter is provided in Table 3.

Table 3 Results from phantom imaging studies. The values reflect the FBP reconstruction for the NEMA Image quality phantom and Derenzo phantom studies

Image noise, spill-over ratio, and recovery coefficient

The percentage standard deviation (%SD) is a measure for noise in the reconstructed image, and the measured values are shown in Fig. 3 (rightmost chart). Its variation is similar for all radionuclides with FBP and OSEM2D reconstruction algorithms; however, OSEM3D-MAP with scatter correction increases noise for 68Ga and 44gSc while decreasing it for 18F and 64Cu. While 18F and 64Cu exhibit similar values, %SD for 68Ga and 44gSc is slightly increased. Note that the same number of counts was acquired for each radionuclide; an increase in %SD therefore indicates a relative decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio in the resulting image.

Fig. 3

Impact of radionuclide and reconstruction algorithm on %SD and SOR in air and water. All data were acquired with the same number of counts. Both the uncorrected and scatter corrected values are presented for comparison

The spill-over ratio (SOR) is a measure for activity falsely assigned to regions in the reconstructed image in which no radioactivity was present during image acquisition. The SOR in air and in water are also found in Fig. 3 as a function of reconstruction algorithm and radionuclide. As expected, the scatter correction decreases the SOR because of the decrease of accepted scattered photons. The reconstruction strategy is the main determinant of the SOR in air which is largely independent of the radionuclide species, as demonstrated in Fig. 3.

The SOR in water has two distinct groupings: the SOR in water for short-range positron emitters (18F and 64Cu) is significantly smaller than for the long-range positron emitters 44gSc and 68Ga. Contrary to air, the SOR in water is determined less by the scatter correction strategy than the positron range. Overall, SOR in water scales with positron range, with 44gSc exhibiting intermediate values between 64Cu and 68Ga.

The recovery coefficient (RC) is a measure of the fraction of activity reconstructed in a small region. RCs are plotted in Fig. 4 as a function of rod size for the different radionuclides and reconstruction strategies. The same overall trend is observed in all graphs: the RC increases towards unity with increasing rod diameter. The RC for 64Cu remains almost constant down to rod sizes of 2 mm before sharply dropping for the 1-mm rod. Among all isotopes, the RC for 68Ga is smallest for all rod sizes, while the RC for 44gSc is only slightly below 18F, with a gradual decrease as a function of rod diameter.

Fig. 4

Impact of radionuclide and reconstruction strategy on measured recovery coefficients (RC)

Contrast and feature size

A comparison of the reconstructed images acquired in the Derenzo phantom is shown in Fig. 5. The transverse cross-section of the hot rods demonstrates a clear difference in appearance between the short-range positron emitters 18F and 64Cu and the long-range positron emitters 68Ga and 44gSc. For the latter two, the ability to distinguish smaller rods and separate them in the reconstructed images was impaired due to significant blurring.

Fig. 5

Derenzo phantom image reconstructed with OSEM2D for different radionuclides

The contrast between the rods and background in each of the six triangular segments was calculated (Eq. 2) and is shown in Fig. 6. There is clear separation between short-range positron emitters 18F and 64Cu, which demonstrate a contrast greater than 0.5 for feature sizes of 1.5 mm and above. While contrast of 44gSc is superior to 68Ga for the larger rod diameters, both radionuclides show the same contrast for rod diameters of 1.5 mm and below, leading to a significant blurring of smaller features (Fig. 5). The rods can no longer be distinguished when their diameters shrink below 1 mm for the long-range positron emitters and 0.8 mm for the short-range positron emitters. This blurring is due to the extrinsic scanner resolution, which is significantly impacted by the positron range. While the contrast is expected to reach zero, measurements for the smallest rod diameters show non-zero values, owing to image noise. As there is a constant activity concentration, less counts are originating from the smaller rods, leading to increased noise; this increased noise can affect contrast measurements, as is apparent in OSEM3D-MAP measurements of contrast with respect to 64Cu and 18F in the 1.25-mm rod, in which 64Cu has a lower value. The 1.25-mm rod is in the regime in which the contrast is decreasing at the greatest rate for OSEM3D-MAP, and increased noise from the smaller diameter rod can affect measurements.

Fig. 6

Normalized contrast as a function of rod size

Coincidence characteristics

The true, scatter, and random event rates measured using the NEC phantom are plotted in Fig. 7 along with the calculated NEC rate (Eq. 3). The random coincidence rate is expected to increase with the square of the single-photon rate, represented by the x-axis (activity); it was found that a second-order polynomial fits the random rate data for all isotopes in the range up to 100 MBq with an R-squared value of 0.999 as expected. The scatter contribution measured for 44gSc is increased relative to 18F and 68Ga, while the true event count rate is decreased.

Fig. 7

Event count rates as a function of radionuclide activity


Imaging of the four radionuclides in the NEMA image quality phantom allowed for a comparison of 18F and the three radiometals 64Cu, 44gSc, and 68Ga, in order of descending half-life and increasing positron range. The %SD measurements revealed a slight noise increase in images acquired with 68Ga and 44gSc, although still within 2–3% of the 18F and 64Cu measurements.

The SOR measurements in water were largely affected by positrons annihilating in the cold volume, as previously observed by Disselhorst et al. in their comparison of the short-range positron emitters 18F and 89Zr in contrast with the long-range positron emitters 68Ga and 124I [38]. 44gSc showed intermediate behavior as expected from a radionuclide with a mean positron emission energy of 632 keV, compared with 18F (250 keV) and 68Ga (836 keV). Overall, SOR in air is markedly decreased for the long-range positron emitters compared with water due to the greatly reduced electron density. However, the radius of the cold region would ideally exceed the maximum positron range of the radionuclide being investigated. Therefore, to obtain a true measure of the contribution of scatter and random coincidences to the reconstructed activity of cold regions, a different phantom design with a larger cold volume would be required for accurate measurements with long-range positron emitters; such a phantom, however, is not currently part of the NEMA test protocol.

The RC measurements revealed that activity recovery in 1 mm diameter structures is at 25% or less for all radionuclides and reconstruction algorithms and increases for larger structures. Once again 44gSc exhibits intermediate behavior between 18F (short range) and 68Ga (long range). This indicates that a distinction beyond long-range and short-range positron emitters must be made when dealing with radionuclides with medium positron emission energies and that general trends can be predicted using positron emission energies.

Generally, the RC measurements for 18F and 64Cu agreed within the bounds of uncertainty. However, certain measurements show deviations, which are due to distinct image artifacts in which the activities in the center of the hot rods were underestimated and the edges were overestimated; these artifacts, known as the Gibbs phenomenon [40], lead to noisier measurements of RC and caused values to exceed the theoretical maximum of 1. The RC measurements are prone to large uncertainty as a single-pixel per transverse cross-section is averaged over an axial profile, and Gibb’s phenomenon will affect the central rod pixel value for different rod sizes; another challenge affecting the measurements is the alignment of the rods with the reconstructed voxel positions. As seen in Fig. 4, this phenomenon leads to noisier measurements for 64Cu and 18F; the RC of the 4-mm rod with 64Cu is measured as decreased compared with 3 mm and 5 mm but remains within the bounds of uncertainty, while the same applies to the RC of the 5-mm rod with 18F reconstructed with OSEM2D demonstrates a decrease with respect to the 4-mm rod. The Gibbs effect should be carefully considered when considering quantification in images reconstructed from activity distributions with sharp transitions, as is the case with hot rods and the short-range positron emitters 64Cu and 18F.

The measurements in the Derenzo phantom allow us to rank the relative contrast in the reconstructed images with the four radionuclides. We find similar measurements for the short-range positron emitters 18F and 64Cu, while the contrast is degraded with 44gSc and to a greater extent with 68Ga for all reconstruction methods. The decreasing contrast can be predicted by the increasing positron energies as well as positron range, and follows the same trend as the relative resolution as determined by Bunka et al. to be 18F > 64Cu > 44gSc > 68Ga [35].

The NEMA image quality study was conducted at activity levels commonly used for pre-clinical research; however, from the count rate curves acquired in the NEC phantom, the NECR curve for 44gSc increases at a lesser rate than that of 18F. This indicates that with increasing activity, the noise is expected to increase at a greater rate for 44gSc than 18F, which is likely due to spurious coincidences caused by the co-emitted 1.157 MeV gamma with 99% abundance. While this noise scaling is not a practical concern for pre-clinical investigations, it suggests that radionuclide specific image quality assessments could be beneficial when larger activities are present in the PET field of view. The total activity used in our studies with the NEMA image quality phantom was 3.7 MBq, which is representative of typical activities used for mice imaging; the %SD is expected to decrease, and the RC is expected to improve if the activity is increased because more counts are acquired with higher activities (assuming similar imaging times), while the SOR should remain constant or decrease as the count rates are in the linear regime at least for activities less than 20 MBq.

The NEMA NU 4-2008 standard for calculating event count rates does not address the case of spurious coincidences caused by the co-emission of prompt gammas during the radionuclide decay. Scattered and random events, which result from two annihilation photons detected in the energy window around 511 keV, cannot be distinguished from spurious coincidences, which involve the detection of at least one prompt gamma. At the current time, the impact of the contribution of spurious coincidences to the event counts for a radionuclide emitting prompt gammas must be assumed via a comparison with a pure positron emitter such as 18F.

Various methods to produce 44gSc exist, each leading to a different radioisotopic composition of the scandium used for imaging. The radioscandium used in this study was produced from natural calcium targets with a radioisotopic purity of 95% 44gSc at end of the beam and it remains at greater than 90% for 9.5 h afterwards (Table 1). Our most abundant co-produced isotope is 43Sc, which is a positron emitter as well and has a 3.89 h half-life. It is also considered a good candidate for PET imaging and has a favorable property that the most energetic and abundant positron emission has mean and maximum energy of 508 and 1199 keV respectively, which is lower than for 44gSc. Consequently, its smaller positron range provides improved resolution compared with 44gSc and 68Ga, as demonstrated by Domnanich et al. [36]. 43Sc may also be a more favorable choice for clinical studies from a radiation safety perspective because high-energy photon emissions, such as the 1157 keV prompt gamma (99.9% yield) emitted by 44gSc, do not occur. Shielding for the high-energy photons emitted by 44gSc does not pose significant challenge in pre-clinical studies (such as this one) because of the relatively low amounts of activity handled and the spatially confined nature of the experiments. When transitioning to patients, however, radiation safety aspects need to be carefully considered in order to ensure adequate protection of personnel and the public. 43Sc might then be preferable despite the somewhat more costly production process which utilizes an enriched calcium target. Initial in vivo human patient studies are underway to compare the dosimetric impact of 44gSc on the patient [41]. Other co-produced radioisotopes with a total abundance of less than 1%, are 44mSc (t1/2 = 58.61 h) which decays to 44gSc and therefore also contributes to the total number of positrons available for imaging, as well as the two long-lived β- contaminants 47Sc (t1/2 = 3.35 days) and 48Sc (t1/2 = 43.67 h). These isotopes are not expected to significantly impact the imaging performance but may contribute to a small error in the absolute measurements of source activity. However, as they make up less than 1% of the total activity at end-of-beam (EOB), their impact is neither noticeable in images nor measurable within the uncertainties inherent in activity measurement with a radionuclide dose calibrator.


The performance of the Siemens Inveon PET scanner was evaluated for 18F and the radiometals 44gSc, 64Cu, and 68Ga. The most significant differences observed in our measurements can be attributed to the radionuclides’ positron emission energy: the short-range positron emitters 18F and 64Cu displayed greater recovery coefficients and contrast, as well as lower spill-over ratios than the long-range positron emitters 68Ga and 44gSc. For a given radionuclide, the OSEM3D-MAP reconstruction provided the best contrast in the reconstructed images.

In conclusion, 44gSc is a promising radionuclide for further study, as its intermediate positron emission energy provides increase contrast compared with 68Ga, another popular radiometal. The contribution of the high-energy gamma emission to image noise should be further studied because of its potential impact on image reconstruction when higher activity levels are present in the scanner’s field of view.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Laforest R, Rowland DJ, Welch MJ. MicroPET imaging with nonconventional isotopes. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2002;49(5):2119–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Levin CS, Hoffman EJ. Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution. Phys Med Biol. 1999;44(3):781.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Alva-Sánchez H, Quintana-Bautista C, Martínez-Dávalos A, Ávila-Rodríguez MA, Rodríguez-Villafuerte M. Positron range in tissue-equivalent materials: experimental microPET studies. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(17):6307.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cal-González J, Herraiz JL, España S, Corzo PMG, Vaquero JJ, Desco M, et al. Positron range estimations with PeneloPET. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(15):5127.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Champion C, Loirec CL. Positron follow-up in liquid water: II. Spatial and energetic study for the most important radioisotopes used in PET. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(22):6605.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Champion C, Loirec CL. Positron follow-up in liquid water: I. A new Monte Carlo track-structure code. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(7):1707.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Lehnert W, Gregoire M-C, Reilhac A, Meikle SR. Analytical positron range modelling in heterogeneous media for PET Monte Carlo simulation. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(11):3313.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jødal L, Loirec CL, Champion C. Positron range in PET imaging: an alternative approach for assessing and correcting the blurring. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(12):3931.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Laforest R, Liu X. Cascade removal and microPET imaging with 76 Br. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(6):1503.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Conti M, Eriksson L. Physics of pure and non-pure positron emitters for PET: a review and a discussion. EJNMMI Phys. 2016;3(1):8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Martin CC, Christian BT, Satter MR, Nickerson LDH, Nickles RJ. Quantitative PET with positron emitters that emit prompt gamma rays. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1995;14(4):681–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schueller MJ, Mulnix TL, Christian BT, Jensen M, Holm S, Oakes TR, et al. Addressing the third gamma problem in PET. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2003;50(1):50–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Anizan N, Carlier T, Hindorf C, Barbet J, Bardiès M. dAcquisition setting optimization and quantitative imaging for 124I studies with the Inveon microPET-CT system. EJNMMI Res. 2012;2:7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Braad PEN, Hansen SB, Thisgaard H, Høilund-Carlsen PF. PET imaging with the non-pure positron emitters: 55 Co, 86 Y and 124 I. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(9):3479.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Buchholz HG, Herzog H, Förster GJ, Reber H, Nickel O, Rösch F, et al. PET imaging with yttrium-86: comparison of phantom measurements acquired with different PET scanners before and after applying background subtraction. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(5):716–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Eigner S, Vera DRB, Fellner M, Loktionova NS, Piel M, Lebeda O, et al. Imaging of protein synthesis: in vitro and in vivo evaluation of 44Sc-DOTA-puromycin. Mol Imaging Biol. 2013;15(1):79–86.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Esteves FP, Nye JA, Khan A, Folks RD, Halkar RK, Garcia EV, et al. Prompt-gamma compensation in Rb-82 myocardial perfusion 3D PET/CT. J Nucl Cardiol. 2010;17(2):247–53.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Robinson S, Julyan PJ, Hastings DL, Zweit J. Performance of a block detector PET scanner in imaging non-pure positron emitters—modelling and experimental validation with 124 I. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(24):5505.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Walrand S, Jamar F, Mathieu I, Camps JD, Lonneux M, Sibomana M, et al. Quantitation in PET using isotopes emitting prompt single gammas: application to yttrium-86. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003;30(3):354–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Huclier-Markai S, Alliot C, Kerdjoudj R, Mougin-Degraef M, Chouin N, Haddad F. Promising scandium radionuclides for nuclear medicine: a review on the production and chemistry up to in vivo proofs of concept. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2018;33(8):316–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Müller C, Domnanich KA, Umbricht CA, van der Meulen NP. Scandium and terbium radionuclides for radiotheranostics: current state of development towards clinical application. Br J Radiol. 2018;15:20180074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Müller C, Bunka M, Haller S, Köster U, Groehn V, Bernhardt P, et al. Promising prospects for 44Sc-/47Sc-based theragnostics: application of 47Sc for radionuclide tumor therapy in mice. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(10):1658–64.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Loveless CS, Radford LL, Ferran SJ, Queern SL, Shepherd MR, Lapi SE. Photonuclear production, chemistry, and in vitro evaluation of the theranostic radionuclide 47Sc. EJNMMI Res. 2019;9(1):42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Severin GW, Engle JW, Valdovinos HF, Barnhart TE, Nickles RJ. Cyclotron produced 44gSc from natural calcium. Appl Radiat Isot. 2012;70(8):1526–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Valdovinos HF, Hernandez R, Barnhart TE, Graves S, Cai W, Nickles RJ. Separation of cyclotron-produced 44Sc from a natural calcium target using a dipentyl pentylphosphonate functionalized extraction resin. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;95:23–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Pruszyński M, Loktionova NS, Filosofov DV, Rösch F. Post-elution processing of 44Ti/44Sc generator-derived 44Sc for clinical application. Appl Radiat Isot. 2010;68(9):1636–41.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Radchenko V, Engle JW, Medvedev DG, Maassen JM, Naranjo CM, Unc GA, et al. Proton-induced production and radiochemical isolation of 44Ti from scandium metal targets for 44Ti/44Sc generator development. Nucl Med Biol. 2017;50(Supplement C):25–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Roesch F. Scandium-44: benefits of a long-lived PET radionuclide available from the 44Ti/44Sc generator system. Curr Radiopharm. 2012;5(3):187–201.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Domnanich KA, Müller C, Farkas R, Schmid RM, Ponsard B, Schibli R, et al. 44Sc for labeling of DOTA- and NODAGA-functionalized peptides: preclinical in vitro and in vivo investigations. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2016;1(1):8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Koumarianou E, Loktionova NS, Fellner M, Roesch F, Thews O, Pawlak D, et al. 44Sc-DOTA-BN[2-14]NH2 in comparison to 68Ga-DOTA-BN[2-14]NH2 in pre-clinical investigation. Is 44Sc a potential radionuclide for PET? Appl Radiat Isot. 2012;70(12):2669–76.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Pruszyński M, Majkowska-Pilip A, Loktionova NS, Eppard E, Roesch F. Radiolabeling of DOTATOC with the long-lived positron emitter 44Sc. Appl Radiat Isot. 2012;70(6):974–9.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    van der Meulen NP, Bunka M, Domnanich KA, Müller C, Haller S, Vermeulen C, et al. Cyclotron production of 44Sc: from bench to bedside. Nucl Med Biol. 2015;42(9):745–51.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Price TW, Greenman J, Stasiuk GJ. Current advances in ligand design for inorganic positron emission tomography tracers 68 Ga, 64 Cu, 89 Zr and 44 Sc. Dalton Trans. 2016;45(40):15702–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Soderlund AT, Chaal J, Tjio G, Totman JJ, Conti M, Townsend DW. Beyond 18F-FDG: Characterization of PET/CT and PET/MR scanners for a comprehensive set of positron emitters of growing application—18F, 11C, 89Zr, 124I, 68Ga, and 90Y. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(8):1285–91.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Bunka M, Müller C, Vermeulen C, Haller S, Türler A, Schibli R, et al. Imaging quality of 44Sc in comparison with five other PET radionuclides using Derenzo phantoms and preclinical PET. Appl Radiat Isot. 2016;110:129–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Domnanich KA, Eichler R, Müller C, Jordi S, Yakusheva V, Braccini S, et al. Production and separation of 43Sc for radiopharmaceutical purposes. EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem. 2017;2(1):14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Williams HA, Robinson S, Julyan P, Zweit J, Hastings D. A comparison of PET imaging characteristics of various copper radioisotopes. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32(12):1473–80.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Disselhorst JA, Brom M, Laverman P, Slump CH, Boerman OC, Oyen WJG, et al. Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner. J Nucl Med. 2010;51(4):610–7.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Goertzen AL, Bao Q, Bergeron M, Blankemeyer E, Blinder S, Cañadas M, et al. NEMA NU 4-2008 comparison of preclinical PET imaging systems. J Nucl Med. 2012;53(8):1300–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Snyder DL, Miller MI, Thomas LJ, Politte DG. Noise and edge artifacts in maximum-likelihood reconstructions for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1987;6(3):228–38.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Eppard E, de la Fuente A, Benešová M, Khawar A, Bundschuh RA, Gärtner FC, et al. Clinical translation and first in-human use of [44Sc]Sc-PSMA-617 for pet imaging of metastasized castrate-resistant prostate cancer. Theranostics. 2017;7(18):4359–69.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Not applicable.


The authors would like to acknowledge the Alberta Innovates Health Solutions (AIHS) and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) for providing funding for the graduate studentship of Mr. Ferguson.

Author information




SF performed the work, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. HSJ assisted with the phantom imaging, data analysis, and writing of the manuscript. TR, MW, and FW all assisted with the data analysis and the writing and review of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Ferguson.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferguson, S., Jans, H., Wuest, M. et al. Comparison of scandium-44 g with other PET radionuclides in pre-clinical PET phantom imaging. EJNMMI Phys 6, 23 (2019).

Download citation


  • Scandium
  • Image quality
  • PET imaging
  • Radiometals