Skip to main content
  • Short communication
  • Open access
  • Published:

Ultra-low foetal radiation exposure in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging with a long axial field-of-view PET/CT system

Abstract

Purpose

Long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems enable PET/CT scans with reduced injected activities because of improved sensitivity. With this study, we aimed to examine the foetal radiation dose from an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan on a LAFOV PET/CT system with reduced injected activity.

Methods

Two pregnant women were retrospectively included and received an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan on a LAFOV PET/CT system with an intravenous bolus injection of 0.30 MBq/kg. Foetal radiation exposure from the PET was estimated using dose conversion factors from three published papers. Radiation exposure from the CT scans was estimated using CT-Expo.

Results

Foetal radiation dose from the PET scan ranged between 0.11 and 0.44 mGy. Foetal radiation exposure from the CT scan ranged between < 0.10 – 0.90 mGy depending if the foetus was included in the field-of-view.

Conclusion

Foetal radiation dose could be reduced to < 1.5 mGy when scanning pregnant patients on a LAFOV PET/CT system. The radiation dose to the foetus was reduced significantly in our study due to the increased sensitivity of the LAFOV PET/CT system.

Introduction

18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging is widely used in oncology for diagnoses, staging and treatment response evaluation [1, 2]. However, in pregnant patients, the use of 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging can cause a dilemma because of the radiation exposure to the foetus [3, 4]. Therefore, it is crucial to minimize the radiation exposure to the foetus when performing an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan. Fortunately, the new long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems exhibit ultra-high sensitivity compared to conventional short axial field-of-view (SAFOV) PET/CT systems, enabling substantial reductions in radioactive tracer dosages [5]. Reducing the amount of injected 18F-FDG activity will subsequently result in a reduced foetal radiation burden.

With this study, we aimed to report the foetal radiation dose when performing an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan on a LAFOV PET/CT system with reduced injected activity.

Materials and methods

Two pregnant patients in the second and third trimester with an indication for a clinical 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for staging of the disease were retrospectively included. Data was collected at the Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc from ongoing clinical investigations and the use of anonymized clinical data was waived by the VU Medical Centre ethics review board. Both scans were collected on the Siemens Vision Quadra PET/CT system (Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN, USA) (LAFOV PET/CT system). The scans were acquired using one static bed position for 20 min. In one patient, the foetus was not included in the field-of-view (FOV) to further reduce foetal radiation exposure. The scan covered the skull vertex to the lower part of the kidneys with the head centred in the middle of the FOV. In the other patient, the foetus was included in the FOV and covered the skull vertex to mid-thigh (Fig. 1a, b).

Fig. 1
figure 1

18F-FDG PET/CT image including both the mother and the foetus with (a) a Maximum Intensity Projection (MIP) 18F-FDG PET image and (b) a slice of the ultra-low-dose CT scan

18F-FDG PET

The patients received an intravenous bolus injection of 0.3 MBq/kg radioactive 18F-FDG and were fasting for 4–6 h before the scan. The scans were reconstructed with the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Ltd 2 (EARL-2) compliant reconstruction protocol [5, 7, 9]. Foetal radiation dose from radioactive 18F-FDG administration was estimated using dose conversion factors (mGy/MBq) from three published papers including second and third-trimester pregnancies [1, 3, 6]. All voiding models were included since the voiding pattern was unknown. Dose conversion factors from first-trimester pregnancies were excluded because foetuses in earlier stages absorb more radiation than foetuses in later stages of the pregnancy [3, 6, 8].

Ultra-low-dose CT

An ultra-low-dose CT (LDCT) scan was applied to correct the PET scan for attenuation. A kilovoltage peak of 100 kVp, tube current of 20 mAs, 0.5 s rotation time and a pitch factor of 1.45 was applied for both CT scans. Radiation exposure to the foetus from the LDCT scans was based on the computed tomography dose index (CTDI) measured in milligray (mGy) and estimated using CT-Expo (version 2.7).

Results

The dose conversion factors from the PET in the three studies ranged from 0.004 mGy/MBq to 0.014 mGy/MBq with a mean foetal radiation exposure of 0.008 ± 0.003 mGy/MBq. The dose conversion factors are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Dose conversion factors from radioactive 18F-FDG

The first patient received an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for staging of a haematological malignancy. The patient received 27.58 MBq radioactive 18F-FDG, resulting in a foetal radiation dose from the PET ranging between 0.11 and 0.39 mGy, with a mean foetal radiation dose of 0.21 ± 0.07 mGy. The foetus was not included in the FOV, resulting in a foetal radiation dose from the LDCT scan of < 0.10 mGy due to scatter radiation. The total radiation dose on the foetus ranged between 0.11 and 0.49 mGy. The second patient received an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan for staging of a solid malignancy and received an intravenous bolus injection of 31.08 MBq radioactive 18F-FDG. The foetal radiation dose from the PET ranged between 0.13 and 0.44 mGy, with a mean foetal radiation dose of 0.24 ± 0.08 mGy. The foetus was included in the FOV, resulting in an estimated foetal radiation dose from the LDCT of 0.90 mGy. Therefore, the total foetal radiation dose ranged between 1.03 and 1.34 mGy. Foetal radiation doses of both patients and patient characteristics are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2 Patient characteristics and foetal PET/CT radiation dose estimates

Discussion

This study aimed to report the foetal radiation dose when pregnant patients received an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan on a LAFOV PET/CT system with reduced injected activity.

We managed to scan patients with only 10% of the normal injected activity when conducting a PET/CT scan on a LAFOV PET/CT system while maintaining acceptable PET image quality. According to the physicians, the quality of the PET images was more than sufficient for disease staging in both cases. The quality of the LDCT scans was reliable for attenuation correction (AC) and provided sufficient quality for anatomical localisation of tracer uptake. The ultra-low administrated radioactivity led to a maximum foetal radiation exposure from the PET of 0.44 mGy. In our study, the estimated foetal radiation dose from a PET scan was noticeably lower compared to previous studies using SAFOV PET/CT systems [1, 6]. They observed a foetal radiation dose from the PET ranging between 1.01 and 2.68 mGy (mean 1.82 ± 0.55). Furthermore, we reduced the foetal dose from the LDCT scan for AC to 0.90 mGy when the foetus was included in the FOV. This is markedly lower compared with the study of Işıkçı et al. [4] that observed radiation exposure from CT scans on the foetus ranging between 8.5 and 16.0 mGy. Moreover, advancements such as the use of tin filters during LDCT acquisition could dramatically reduce radiation exposure for AC by as much as 90%, as recently demonstrated by Mostafapour et al. [10]. Applying the tin filter to our LDCT scans will reduce the foetal radiation exposure by eight to ten times, resulting in a foetal radiation exposure ranging between 0.09 and 0.11 mGy when the foetus is included in the FOV. The radiation dose to the foetus from an 18F-FDG PET/CT scan might then be considered imperceptible given that a foetal radiation dose below 1.0 mGy is generally considered safe and negligible according to existing literature [11]. Based on these findings, we can conclude that the ultra-high sensitivity of LAFOV PET/CT systems reduced the radiation dose to the foetus significantly and, in the future, the radiation exposure from an 18F-FDG PET/CT might be negligible for the foetus.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Takalkar AM, Khandelwal A, Lokitz S, Lilien DL, Stabin MG. 18F-FDG PET in pregnancy and fetal radiation dose estimates. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1035–40. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.110.085381.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrington SF, Mikhaeel NG, Kostakoglu L, Meignan M, Hutchings M, Mueller SP et al. Role of imaging in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma: consensus of the International Conference on Malignant Lymphomas Imaging Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3048-58. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5229.

  3. Stabin MG. New-generation fetal dose estimates for Radiopharmaceuticals. J Nucl Med. 2018;59:1005–6. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.117.204214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Isikçi NI, Demir M. Embryo/Fetus doses from F-Fludeoxyglucose Radiopharmaceutical in Positron Emission Tomography/ Computed Tomography. J Med Phys. 2022;47:109–13. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.jmp_115_21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Prenosil GA, Sari H, Furstner M, Afshar-Oromieh A, Shi K, Rominger A, Hentschel M. Performance characteristics of the Biograph vision quadra PET/CT system with a long Axial Field of View using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard. J Nucl Med. 2022;63:476–84. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.261972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zanotti-Fregonara P, Laforest R, Wallis JW. Fetal Radiation dose from 18F-FDG in pregnant patients imaged with PET, PET/CT, and PET/MR. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1218–22. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.115.157032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van Sluis J, van Snick JH, Brouwers AH, Noordzij W, Dierckx R, Borra RJH, et al. EARL compliance and imaging optimisation on the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT using phantom and clinical data. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022;49:4652–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-022-05919-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Stabin MG. Proposed addendum to previously published fetal dose estimate tables for 18F-FDG. J Nucl Med. 2004;45:634–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boellaard R, Delgado-Bolton R, Oyen WJ, Giammarile F, Tatsch K, Eschner W, et al. FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:328–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-014-2961-x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mostafapour S, Greuter M, van Snick JH, Brouwers AH, Dierckx R, van Sluis J, et al. Ultra-low dose CT scanning for PET/CT. Med Phys. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.16862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozbayrak M, Cavdar I, Seven M, Uslu L, Yeyin N, Tanyildizi H, et al. Determining and managing fetal Radiation Dose from Diagnostic Radiology procedures in Turkey. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16:1276–82. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.6.1276.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the patients who participated in this study and all the department members for their contributions.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CS, GZ, MY and RB designed and planned the study. GZ, JK and CS collected the data. CS analysed the data under supervision of RW, GZ, MY and RB. RW coordinated CT dose calculation. CS wrote the original draft of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlotte L. C. Smith.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The use of anonymized clinical data was waived by the VU Medical Centre ethics review board.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smith, C.L.C., Yaqub, M., Wellenberg, R.H.H. et al. Ultra-low foetal radiation exposure in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging with a long axial field-of-view PET/CT system. EJNMMI Phys 11, 45 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00648-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-024-00648-w

Keywords