Skip to main content

An in vivo multimodal feasibility study in a rat brain tumour model using flexible multinuclear MR and PET systems



In addition to the structural information afforded by 1H MRI, the use of X-nuclei, such as sodium-23 (23Na) or phosphorus-31 (31P), offers important complementary information concerning physiological and biochemical parameters. By then combining this technique with PET, which provides valuable insight into a wide range of metabolic and molecular processes by using of a variety of radioactive tracers, the scope of medical imaging and diagnostics can be significantly increased. While the use of multimodal imaging is undoubtedly advantageous, identifying the optimal combination of these parameters to diagnose a specific dysfunction is very important and is advanced by the use of sophisticated imaging techniques in specific animal models.


In this pilot study, rats with intracerebral 9L gliosarcomas were used to explore a combination of sequential multinuclear MRI using a sophisticated switchable coil set in a small animal 9.4 T MRI scanner and, subsequently, a small animal PET with the tumour tracer O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET). This made it possible for in vivo multinuclear MR-PET experiments to be conducted without compromising the performance of either multinuclear MR or PET.


High-quality in vivo images and spectra including high-resolution 1H imaging, 23Na-weighted imaging, detection of 31P metabolites and [18F]FET uptake were obtained, allowing the characterisation of tumour tissues in comparison to a healthy brain. It has been reported in the literature that these parameters are useful in the identification of the genetic profile of gliomas, particularly concerning the mutation of the isocitrate hydrogenase gene, which is highly relevant for treatment strategy.


The combination of multinuclear MR and PET in, for example, brain tumour models with specific genetic mutations will enable the physiological background of signal alterations to be explored and the identification of the optimal combination of imaging parameters for the non-invasive characterisation of the molecular profile of tumours.


Proton magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) are well-established medical imaging modalities used in current routine clinical practice. MRI is typically employed to generate structural/anatomical images with both outstanding soft-tissue contrast and functional information. Alongside other MR techniques, the use of X-nuclei (nuclei other than 1H), such as sodium-23 (23Na) or phosphorus-31 (31P), which play a pivotal role in biochemistry and physiology, may provide complementary information with regard to cell membrane integrity and energy metabolism [1,2,3].

Interest in X-nuclei MRI has increased with recent technological developments [4,5,6,7,8,9] relating to a combination of increasing magnetic field strengths and advancements in MR coils and sequences. The sequences allow, for example, for the simultaneous acquisition of 23Na images weighted by restricted and non-restricted sodium concentration [10], or for 1H observed 31P editing [11] or saturation transfer of 31P metabolite signals [12]. These offer the opportunity to perform multinuclear MR imaging and spectroscopy with improved sensitivity, despite the challenges of detecting X-nuclei MR signals due to their relatively low natural abundance compared to the proton. MR-detectable 23Na signals can originate from both intra- and extracellular compartments of tissue. Any irregularity in tissue metabolism leads to remarkable 23Na signal intensity changes, and in tumours, the sodium concentration level is usually elevated [3, 13, 14]. 31P MR spectroscopy (MRS) provides information about a number of metabolites, such as adenosine triphosphate (ATP), phosphocreatine (PCr), phosphomonoester (PME), phosphodiester (PDE) and inorganic phosphate (Pi), with a relatively large chemical shift range (~ 30 ppm). Alterations in these metabolite peaks, either in intensity or in chemical shift, are also strongly related to a variety of pathological and neurodegenerative conditions [15,16,17].

PET uses a plethora of radioactive tracers to provide insight into molecular and metabolic processes with both a high level of specificity and sensitivity, whereby the latter can be, under optimal circumstances, a factor of 106 greater than in MRI. For example, PET with radiolabelled amino acids, such as O-(2-[18F]-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ([18F]FET) can provide diagnostic information in patients with gliomas [18,19,20,21,22]. [18F]FET shows low uptake in inflammatory lesions and healthy brain tissues but high uptake in gliomas due to an upregulation of specific amino acid transporters [22, 23]. This promises high specificity and high accuracy in the detection and differentiation of tumour cells and can be further improved when combined with MRI [24,25,26].

The optimal way to achieve maximum diagnostic accuracy would be to ascertain the best combination for non-invasive characterisation of unknown lesions by performing all possible imaging methods on a large number of patients. However, this is limited by the fact that patients are often seriously ill and can only tolerate a limited number of examinations. Therefore, sophisticated methods for experimental and translational imaging in animal models are of great importance for the provision of a direct comparison to the results of histological and physiological parameters. Due to recent technical advancements in genetic engineering, tumour models with a specific genetic profile can now be generated which allow imaging methods to be tested for the non-invasive prediction of the corresponding genetic profile [27]. In this context, we have developed a stand-alone, simple multinuclear MR system for imaging animals at ultra-high field [28] which is also capable of sequential acquisition with PET. In this proof of concept study, we explored the in vivo feasibility of multinuclear and multimodal experiments in an ultra-high field MR-PET set-up in rats using intracerebral 9L gliosarcomas. To our knowledge, this combination of multinuclear MR (using more than three nuclei) and PET for in vivo applications has never been demonstrated.

Material and methods

Multinuclear MRI and PET system

All MR experiments were carried out on a home-integrated small animal dedicated 9.4 T MRI scanner. This system operates on clinical software from Siemens SYNGO [29]. Multinuclear MR acquisitions of 1H (399.7 MHz, corresponding Larmor frequency of 1H at 9.4 T), 23Na (105.8 MHz) and 31P (161.9 MHz) were achieved using the exchangeable multinuclear coil set (Fig. 1a), including a correspondingly tuned, quadrature birdcage head coil, a transmit/receive (T/R) switch and a pre-amplifier [28]. The benefit of this switchable multinuclear coil is that the maximum achievable coil sensitivity is attainable for any nuclei, which is hardly feasible using a conventional double- or triple-tuned coil configuration. In terms of the double-tuned coil, a reduction in sensitivity of approximately 25% is anticipated at both the 1H and X-nuclei frequencies due to the insertion of lossy decoupling units, such as LC traps or PIN-diodes. The performance of the coil only on a test phantom for the individual nucleus has been reported elsewhere [28]. The anaesthetised animal was positioned from the front side of the magnet while these coil sets can be accessed and swapped from the opposite side. This ensures that the animal is not disturbed and remains in the same position during the coil change. All PET measurements were performed on a commercial pre-clinical INVEON PET imager (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). An [18F]FET-PET tracer was used which was synthesised in-house with a specific radioactivity (< 200 GBq/μmol) [30].

Fig. 1

Picture of multinuclear MRI system showing RF coils and T/R switches (a), and MR, PET and transport systems with an example of measurement acquisition schemes (b)

MR-PET common bed and animal transport system

A 3D printer (Fortus 400mc, Stratasys, MN, USA) using biocompatible polycarbonate was utilised to design and construct the dedicated bed for the rats and the common MR-PET bed adapter. This purpose-built bed contains a freely adjustable bite bar, a nose cone, gas in/out tubes for anaesthesia, a respiratory monitoring pad and a temperature-monitoring unit (SA Instruments, USA). Figure 1b shows the Perspex box (pre-filled with isoflurane) to transport the animal bed along with the anaesthetised animal from the MR unit to the PET site (< 3 min) without disturbance.

Animal handling and tumour inoculation

All animal measurements were approved by the Animal Protection Committee of the local government (LANUV, North-Rhine-Westphalia, Germany) according to the German Animal Welfare Act and the European Community Council directives regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and scientific purposes (2010/63/EU). All rats weighed between 250 and 310 g and were handled under standard housing conditions (12/12-h light/dark cycle, approximately 22 °C room temperature and 54% humidity, free access to water and food) in the animal facility of Forschungszentrum Juelich. Four Fischer-344 rats purchased from Charles River Laboratories (Germany) were included in this study.

Rodent 9L gliosarcoma cells were implanted into the right striatum of two male rats (rat1 and rat2), as previously described [31]. 9L cells invade contiguous brain tissue and develop neovascularisation, which is a hallmark of aggressive gliomas, but tumour margins are still well delineated. The other two female rats (rat3 and rat4) were also used as healthy controls. Tumours were allowed to grow for 11 to 12 days followed by MR and PET measurements. Rats were anaesthetised with 2 to 5% isoflurane in oxygen and placed into the animal scanner, in which they were measured under continuous isoflurane anaesthesia. During both MR and PET measurements, the temperature and respiratory rate of the rats were maintained at around 37.8 °C and between 48 and 55 bpm, respectively. At the time of transportation, isoflurane pre-filled in the box was used to maintain anaesthesia. For the PET scans, a venous catheter was inserted into a tail vein of the rat to deliver the [18F]FET tracer.

Data acquisition scheme and analysis

1H MRI, 23Na MRI and 31P MRS

As described in Fig. 1b, standard adjustments, such as shimming and RF power calibration, were performed using the proton coil prior to multinuclear experiments and the optimised shim values for the brain region were employed for all other nuclei during the MR data acquisition. Experiments were carried out using standard MR sequences cloned from the clinical platform from Siemens since the scanner uses the same hardware apart from coils and magnets. The high resolution structure T2-weighted 1H images were obtained using a turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence [32] in all axes.

23Na images were collected using either a 3D FLASH [33] for rats1,3,4 in Fig. 2 or a simultaneous single-quantum and triple-quantum-filtered MRI of 23Na (SISTINA) sequence for a rat2 in Fig. 3. Using the advanced SISTINA sequence with multiple phase cycling [10, 34], ultrashort TE (UTE), single-quantum and triple-quantum-filtered 23Na images can be generated in a single acquisition, as shown in Fig. 3. This allows for the concurrent acquisition of images leading to the presence of restricted/non-restricted sodium and sodium density-weighted images, which is not possible with the conventional method.

Fig. 2

Multinuclear 1H MR, 23Na MR and [18F]FET-PET images (top) and 31P spectra with fitting (bottom) of healthy (left, rat3) and tumour-bearing (right, pointed out by the red arrow, rat1) in vivo rat brain. S1-5, PME, PDE and VOI denote axial slice numbers of the rat brain, phosphomonoester (PME), phosphodiester (PDE) and voxel-of-interest (VOI), respectively

Fig. 3

Axial, coronal and sagittal images of 1H, ultrashort TE (UTE)/single-quantum (SQ)/triple-quantum-filtered (TQF) 23Na (left), co-registered MR (bottom left) and [18F]FET-PET images (bottom right) of tumour (pointed out by the red arrow) in vivo rat brain (rat2) together with 31P MR spectrum with fitting (top right) where the shim-adjusting volume (green box) and 31P voxel localisation (yellow box) are shown. 23Na images acquired using UTE, SQ and TQ represent total 23Na concentration-weighted, non-restricted (mainly extracellular) and restricted (mainly intracellular) 23Na, respectively

A localised image-selected in vivo spectroscopy (ISIS) sequence [35] was used to acquire 31P spectra. 31P MR spectra were processed with the use of the advanced method for accurate, robust and efficient spectral fitting (AMARES) provided by jMRUI [36], and the 31P metabolites were analysed, such as a PCr/Pi ratio as an example. The detailed MR scan parameters for each experiment are summarised in Table 1. The acquired MR images were then analysed and co-registered using in-house MATLAB (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) and ITK-SNAP software [37].

Table 1 Detailed MR sequence parameters


A transmission scan (~ 10 min) with a retractable 57Co point source for attenuation and scattering corrections was initially carried out prior to PET data acquisition. The acquisition was then performed in the 3D list mode (~ 65 min) starting with an injection of 40 ± 3 (mean ± range) MBq [18F]FET in saline into the tail vein (bolus injection of 0.5 ml in 1 min). Emission data were framed into a dynamic sequence of 6 × 10 s, 5 × 60 s, 5 × 3 min, 10 × 4 min frames. Filtered back-projection with ramp filter (cut-off = 0.5) was employed for the reconstruction of 159 slices, with a voxel size of 0.8 × 0.8 × 0.8 mm3. All images were corrected for random coincidences, scatter and attenuation. [18F]FET uptakes in the tumour and healthy tissue were expressed as standardised uptake values by dividing the radioactivity (kBq/mL) in the tumour and tissue, respectively, by the radioactivity injected per gram of body weight. Tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRs) were also calculated by dividing the mean value of the tumour by the mean value of normal brain tissue. Summed PET images (18–60 min post-injection) were used for co-registration of MR and PET images. The acquired PET data were analysed using PMOD (PMOD Technologies LLC., Switzerland) and the co-registration with other nuclei was manually carried out with the aid of the landmarking in the body.


Figure 2 shows a series of five transverse slices of in vivo multinuclear MR (1H, 23Na and 31P) and [18F]FET-PET measurements from the brains of healthy rats (left) and the rat1 with brain tumours (right). 1H MR images present structural details of the rat head and brain and show hyperintensities in the region of the tumour. The anatomical proton images were used as a reference for co-registration of either the 23Na or [18F]FET-PET images.

The 23Na images weighted for total tissue sodium concentration showed a relatively homogenous signal in the healthy brain, while the sodium signal intensity in the tumour region was considerably elevated providing high contrast to the healthy tissue. Ventricles and skin were also clearly distinguishable due to their higher sodium concentration. The tumour exhibits high [18F]FET uptake with a similar extent as in the 1H MRI. The standardised uptake values (SUV) of the tumour and normal brain tissue were calculated as 1.511 and 0.755, respectively, and the TBR was 2.0. In 31P MR spectra, the PCr/Pi ratio is 50% lower than in the normal brain. The voxel-of-interest (VOI) of 31P was localised in the tumour region as shown at the bottom right in Fig. 2.

Figure 3 (left) shows 23Na images from each slice of axial, coronal and sagittal plane, with different weightings. Using the SISTINA sequence [10], intracellular and extracellular sodium signal contribution can be largely differentiated. UTE and single-quantum (SQ) 23Na images show the tissue sodium concentration contrast in the brain with high spatial resolution. It was found that higher sodium concentration in UTE (~ 64%) and in SQ (~ 88%) images was observed in the region of the tumour tissue compared to the normal tissue. This was also in accordance with increased [18F]FET uptake (SUVs of tumour/normal = 1.377/0.660 and TBR = 2.1). In contrast, triple-quantum-filtered (TQF) images, also acquired using SISTINA, showed a 32% lower signal in the tumour region. A localised single voxel 31P spectrum, also shown in Fig. 3, depicts excellent signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to clearly distinguish individual 31P metabolites.


In this pilot study, we have successfully demonstrated the in vivo feasibility of multinuclear and multimodal rat brain tumour imaging using an ultra-high field MR-PET set-up. The results are based on the previous MR development of a sophisticated RF system which included the RF coils and interface essential for performing multinuclear MR experiments [28]. The development of this system was particularly challenging, as increasing the number of available nuclei in the MR setup is likely to result in substantial SNR loss and degradation of image quality [38,39,40] if the utmost care is not taken. When comparing the performance of a double- or triple-tuned coil, single-tuned coils are always used as reference coils. Hence, because our proposed coil system comprises only single-tuned coils, which are similar to the reference coils in the literature, it can be assumed that there was no signal loss in any of the measured nuclei. Compared to double- or triple-tuned coils, these single-tuned coils benefit from optimal SNR. However, although there is a temporal penalty associated with switching coils, this is considered to be negligible as the switching can be achieved in under a minute, and animal repositioning is not required during the change of coil [28].

In this study, we have also shown how multinuclear MR in an ultra-high field preclinical scanner can be used in conjunction with [18F]FET-PET to verify the potential feasibility of different X-nuclei and the metabolic information thus derived. The results obtained were comparable with previous studies in the literature [10, 31, 41] showing hyperintensity in 23Na UTE, high [18F]FET uptake in PET images and a reduction of PCr/Pi ratio in the tumour compared to the healthy brain. Changes in 31P metabolite ratios, such as PME/PDE, PDE/Pi, PCr/Pi and ATP/Pi, and in intracellular pH appeared to be different in various brain tumour types and grades [41]. Considerable differences in the concentration of 31P metabolites were observed in tumour tissue compared with normal, healthy brain tissue. All 1H, 23Na and [18F]FET-PET images appear to specify regions of abnormal contrast. In particular, differences in 23Na imaging were comparable to the results of a previous study [42], in which information obtained with 23Na imaging was used to aid prediction of the mutational status of the enzyme isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH). The molecular genetic profile of cerebral gliomas such as IDH mutation is of increasing importance for the individual treatment strategy of patients [43]. Since this requires a biopsy of the brain tumour, there is a major interest in obtaining such information non-invasively using modern molecular imaging techniques. In the study mentioned above, IDH-mutated gliomas exhibited a significant increase in total 23Na concentration, a relative increase of 23Na ions with unrestricted mobility and a relative decrease of 23Na ions with restricted mobility. In contrast, none of the IDH wild-type gliomas showed this pattern, and all sodium imaging parameters were significantly different compared with those of IDH-mutated gliomas [42]. It is anticipated that due to the availability of corresponding glioma models with and without IDH mutation, in the future, it will be possible to analyse such findings with multinuclear and multimodal in vivo rat brain tumour imaging [44]. These investigations are of great importance since the exact mechanisms influencing the sodium signal may be caused by various factors. Thus, a relative decrease in the concentration of sodium ions with restricted mobility may be influenced by an increase in the intracellular or extracellular space. The elucidation of this requires a detailed analysis of histological parameters, which are readily available in animal models.

The combination of multinuclear MR (more than three nuclei) and PET in, for example, brain tumour models with specific genetic mutations will enable exploration of the physiological background of signal alterations and the identification of the optimal combination of imaging parameters for the non-invasive characterisation of the molecular profile of tumours. Depending on the MR nuclei and the PET tracer of interest, the acquisition scheme can be flexibly redesigned, for example, to validate cerebral oxygen consumption mapping [45], to investigate the cellular regulatory activity using the Na+/K- pump [46] or to monitor pyruvate and lactate in the tumour [47].

Interest in simultaneously operating MR-PET hybrid clinical systems is increasing, due to the reduction in acquisition time, which can be reallocated for adding other nuclei in the acquisition process and to study multiple biological parameters simultaneously and with high spatial and high temporal resolution [4, 48,49,50]. Notwithstanding the fact that our study was performed sequentially on two separate scanners, it shows the potential for the future development of ultra-high field, multinuclear MR-PET hybrid scanners capable of simultaneous operation.


The combination of multinuclear MR and PET offers complementary information for the investigation of brain tumours. The unique integration of MR-PET, as proposed, allows in vivo preclinical multinuclear MR-PET experiments to be conducted without compromising any aspects of multinuclear MR or PET qualities. Since using conventional MRI does not always provide the required level of detail to determine the grade of brain tumours, to differentiate radiation necrosis from tumour recurrence, or to detect treatment responses, X-nuclei MR in combination with PET may be a more appropriate strategy to fulfil this purpose.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.









Advance method for accurate, robust and efficient spectral fitting


Adenosine triphosphate


Isocitrate dehydrogenase


Localised image-selected in vivo spectroscopy


Magnetic resonance imaging


Magnetic resonance spectroscopy






Positron emission tomography


Inorganic phosphate




Simultaneous single-quantum and triple-quantum filtered MRI of 23Na


Signal-to-noise ratio




Standardised uptake values


Tumour-to-brain ratio






Turbo spin echo


Ultrashort TE




  1. 1.

    Kemp G. Non-invasive methods for studying brain energy metabolism: what they show and what it means. Dev. Neurosci. 2000;22:418–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Magistretti PJ, Allaman I. A cellular perspective on brain energy metabolism and functional imaging. Neuron. 2015;86:883–96.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Madelin G, Lee JS, Regatte RR, Jerschow A. Sodium MRI: Methods and applications. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 2014;79:14–47.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Shah NJ. Multimodal neuroimaging in humans at 9.4T: a technological breakthrough towards an advanced metabolic imaging scanner. Brain Struct Funct. 2014;220:1867–84.

  5. 5.

    Kraff O, Fischer A, Nagel AM, Mönninghoff C, Ladd ME. MRI at 7 Tesla and Above: Demonstrated and Potential Capabilities. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging. 2015;41:13–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Budinger RG, Bird MD. MRI and MRS of the human brain at magnetic fields of 14 T to 20 T: Technical feasibility, safety, and neuroscience horizons. Neuroimage. 2018;168:509–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schepkin V. Sodium MRI of glioma in animal models at ultrahigh magnetic fields. NMR Biomed. 2015;29:175–86.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Shajan G, Mirkes C, Buckenmaier K, Hoffmann J, Rohmann R, Scheffler K. Three-layered radio frequency coil arrangement for sodium MRI of the human brain at 9.4 Tesla. Magn Reson Med. 2016;75:906–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    van de Bank BL, Orzada S, Smits F, Lagemaat MW, Rodgers CT, Bitz AK, Scheenen TW. Optimized 31P MRS in the human brain at 7T with a dedicated RF coil setup. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:1570–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Fiege DP, Romanzetti S, Mirkes CC, Brenner D, Shah NJ. Simultaneous single-quantum and triple-quantum-filtered MRI of 23Na (SISTINA). Magn. Reson. Med. 2013;69:1691–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Wijnen JP, Klomp DW, Nabuurs CI, de Graaf RA, van Kalleveen IM, van der Kemp WJ, Luijten PR, Kruit MC, Webb A, Kan HE, Boer VO. Proton observed phosphorus editing (POPE) for in vivo detection of phospholipid metabolites. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:1222–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ren J, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. 31P-MRS of healthy human brain: ATP synthesis, metabolite concentrations, pH, and T1 relaxation times. NMR Biomed. 2015;28:1455–62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Ouwerkerk R. Sodium MRI. In: Modo M, Bulte JWM. editors. Humana Press; 2011. pp. 175-201.

  14. 14.

    Shah NJ, Worthoff WA, Langen K-J. Imaging of sodium in the brain: a brief review. NMR Biomed. 2016;29:162–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Mirkes CC, Shajan G, Chadzynski G, Buckenmaier K, Bender B, Scheffler K. 31P CSI of the human brain in healthy subjects and tumor patients at 9.4T with a three-layered multi-nuclear coil: initial results. Magn Reson Mater Phy. 2016;29:579–89.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Tkac I, Henry PG, Zacharoff L, Wedel M, Gong W, Deelchand DK, Li T, Dubinsky JM. Homeostatic adaptations in brain energy metabolism in mouse models of Huntington disease. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2012;32:1977–88.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wenger KJ, Hattingen E, Franz K, Steinbach JP, Bähr O, Pilatus U. Intracellular pH measured by 31P-MR-Spectroscopy might predict site of progression in recurrent glioblastoma under antiangiogenic therapy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46:1200–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Langen K-J, Tatsch K, Grosu AL, Jacobs AH, Weckesser M, Sabri O. Diagnostics of cerebral gliomas with radiolabeled amino acids. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2008;105:55–61.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Galldiks N, Langen K-J. Applications of PET imaging of neurological tumors with radiolabeled amino acids. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging. 2015;59:70–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Albert NL, Weller M, Suchorska B, Galldiks N, Soffietti R, Kim MM, la Fougère C, Pope W, Law I, Arbizu J, Chamberlain MC, Vogelbaum M, Ellingson BM, Tonn JC. Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology working group and European Association for Neuro-Oncology recommendations for the clinical use of PET imaging in gliomas. Neuro. Oncol. 2016;18:1199–208.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Glaudemans AW, Enting RH, Heesters MA, Dierckx RA, van Rheenen RW, Walenkamp AM, Slart RH. Value of 11C-methionine PET in imaging brain tumours and metastases. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:615–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Langen K-J, Hamacher K, Weckesser M, Floeth F, Stoffels G, Bauer D, Coenen HH, Pauleit D. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine: uptake mechanisms and clinical applications. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2006;33:287–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Pauleit D, Stoffels G, Bachofner A, Floeth FW, Sabel M, Herzog H, Tellmann L, Jansen P, Reifenberger G, Hamacher K, Coenen HH, Langen KJ. Comparison of (18)F-FET and (18)F-FDG PET in brain tumors. Nucl. Med. Biol. 2009;36:779–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, Riemenschneider MJ, Reifenberger G, Müller HW, Zilles K, Coenen HH, Langen KJ. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain. 2005;128:678–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Galldiks N. law I, Pope WB, Arbizu J, Langen K-J. The use of amino acid PET and conventional MRI for monitoring of brain tumor therapy. NeuroImage: Clinical. 2017;13:386–94.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lau EWF, Drummond KJ, Ware RE, Drummond E, Hogg A, Ryan G, Grigg A, Callahan J, Hicks RJ. Comparative PET study using F-18 FET and F-18 FDG for the evaluation of patients with suspected brain tumour. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2010;17:43–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Connolly NP, Stokum JA, Schneider CS, et al. Genetically engineered rat gliomas: PDGF-driven tumor initiation and progression in tv-a transgenic rats recreate key features of human brain cancer. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0174557.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Choi C-H, Ha Y, Veeraiah P, Felder J, Möllenhoff K, Shah NJ. Development of a simple multinuclear MRI system for ultra high-field imaging of animals. J. Magn. Reson. 2016;273:28–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Felder J, Celik A, Choi C-H, Schwan S, Shah NJ. 9.4T small animal MRI using clinical components for direct translational studies. J Transl Med. 2017;15:264.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hamacher K, Coenen HH. Efficient routine production of the 18F-labelled amino acid O-2-18F fluoroethyl-L-tyrosine. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2002;57:853–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Stegmayr C, Schöneck M, Oliveira D, Willuweit A, Filss C, Galldiks N, Shah NJ, Coenen HH, Langen KJ. Reproducibility of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine uptake kinetics in brain tumors and influence of corticoid therapy: an experimental study in rat glomas. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:1115–23.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. RARE imaging: A fast imaging method for clinical MR. Magn. Reson. Med. 1986;3:823–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Haase A, Frahm J, Matthaei D, Hänicke W, Merboldt KD. FLASH imaging: rapid NMR imaging using low flip angle pulses. J Magn Reson. 1986;67:258–66.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ivchenko N, Hughes CE, Levitt MH. Multiplex phase cycling. J Magn Reson. 2003;160:52–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ordidge RJ, Connelly A, Lohman JAB. Image-selected in vivo spectroscopy (ISIS). A new technique for spatially selective nmr spectroscopy. J Magn Reson. 1986;66:283–94.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Stefan D, Cesare FD, Andrasescu A, Popa E, Lazariev A, Vescovo E, Strbak O, Williams S, Starcuk Z, Cabanas M, Van Ormondt D, Graveron-Demilly D. Quantitation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals: the jMRUI software package. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2009;20:104035.

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage. 2006;31:1116–28.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wetterling F, et al. A triple-resonant coil system for inherently co-registerd proton-, sodium- and chloride-MRI at 9.4T. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meting of ISMRM. 2011;19:3501.

  39. 39.

    Alecci M, Romanzetti S, Kaffanke J, Celik A, Wegener HP, Shah NJ. Practical design of a 4 T double-tuned RF surface coil for interleaved 1H and 23Na MRI of rat brain. J Magn Reson. 2006;181:203–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Choi C-H, Hong S-M, Ha Y, Shah NJ. Design and construction of a novel 1H/19F double-tuned coil system using PIN-diode switches at 9.4T. J Magn Reson. 2017;279:11–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ha D-H, Choi S, Oh JY, Yoon SK, Kang MJ, Kim KU. Application of 31P MR spectroscopy to the brain tumors. Korean J. Radiol. 2013;14:477–86.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Shymanskaya A, Worthoff WA, Stoffels G, et al. Comparison of [18F]Fluoroethyltyrosine PET and Sodium MRI in Cerebral Gliomas: a Pilot Study. Mol. Imaging Biol. 2020;22:198–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, et al. The 2016 world health organization classification of tumors oft he central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathjologica. 2016;131:803–20.

    Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Miyata S, Tominaga K, Sakashita E, et al. Comprehensive metabolomic analysis of IDH1R132H clinical glioma samples reveals suppression of B-oxidation due to carnitine deficiency. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:9787.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Atkinson IC, Thulborn KR. Feasibility of mapping the tissue mass corrected bioscale of cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption using 17-oxygen and 23-sodium MR imaging in a human brain at 9.4 T. Neuroimage. 2010;51:723–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kirsch S, Augath M, Seiffge D, Schilling L, Schad LR. In vivo chlorine-35, sodium-23 and proton magnetic resonance imaging of the rat. NMR Biomed. 2010;23:1099–492.

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Golman K, Zandt RI, Lerche M, Pehrson R, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH. Metabolic imaging by hyperpolarized C-13 magnetic resonance imaging for in vivo tumor diagnosis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:10855–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Neuner I, Kaffanke JB, Langen KJ, et al. Multimodal imaging utilising integrated MR-PET for human brain tumour assessment. Eur. Radiol. 2012;22:2568–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Sundar LKS, Baajjour S, Beyer T, et al. Fully integrated PET/MR imaging for the assessment of the relationship between functional connectivity and glucose metabolic rate. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:252.

    Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Sander CY, Hansen HD, Wey HY. Advances in simultaneous PET/MR for imaging neuroreceptor function. Journal of cerebral blood flow & metabolism. 2020;40(6):1148–66.

    Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Dr. Lohmann and Dr. Willuweit for their support on the animal work, and Ms. Rick for proofreading.


No specific funding was available to support this study. Open access funding provided by Projekt DEAL.

Author information




Conceived/designed the research: C.-H.C, C.S., K.-J.L., and N.J.S.; performed experiments: C.-H.C., C.S., and N.A.D; wrote the manuscript: C.-H.C.; commented/reviewed on the manuscript: all authors; multinuclear MRI system development: C.-H.C.; MRI hardware: C.-H.C and J.F; MR data processing/analysis: 1H (C.-H.C.); 23Na (A.S., W.A.W., C.-H.C.), 31P (C.-H.C.), FET-PET data processing/analysis: C.S. and K.-J.L.; tumour surgery and animal handling: C.S. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. Jon Shah.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, C., Stegmayr, C., Shymanskaya, A. et al. An in vivo multimodal feasibility study in a rat brain tumour model using flexible multinuclear MR and PET systems. EJNMMI Phys 7, 50 (2020).

Download citation


  • MR PET
  • MRI
  • Multinuclear
  • Multimodal
  • Small animal