- Meeting abstract
- Open Access
Adapting MR-BrainPET scans for comparison with conventional PET: experiences with dynamic FET-PET in brain tumours
EJNMMI Physics volume 1, Article number: A64 (2014)
Imaging results from subsequent measurements (preclinical 3T MR-BrainPET, HR+) are compared. O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET) may exhibit non-uniform tracer uptake in gliomas. The aim was to analyse and adapt the physical properties of the scanners and study variations of biological tumour volume (BTV) in early and late FET-PET.
Spatial resolution of the BrainPET and HR+ was measured according to NEMA standard. For evaluation of a threshold-based volume determination -as used for BTV- volumes of an 18F-filled spheres phantom were evaluated. Influence of different filter kernels for correction of differences in spatial resolution hereon was compared.
Differences in BTV between early and late FET-PET of 45 patients were analysed. BTV was determined using a tumour-to-brain ratio ≥1.6 .
Spatial resolution (FWHM) of the BrainPET was 2.63mm–3.47mm and 4.39mm–5.10mm for the HR+ (10mm off-centre) . 3D-filtered backprojection was used for reconstruction . BTV of largest sphere was 22.8ml in HR+ and between 23.2ml (unfiltered) and 24.5ml (3D-Gaussian 3.5mm) in the BrainPET. BTV of smallest sphere was 0.1 ml in HR+ and between 0.2ml (unfiltered) and 0.06ml (3D-Gaussian 3.5mm) in the BrainPET. A 2.5mm filter showed the smallest deviation for all spheres and was applied to the BrainPET data for cross-scanner comparison. Changes in BTV >10% were considered significant and not related to physical differences between scanners.
41% of patients showed a considerable deviation between early and late FET-PET. BTV increased in 14 patients. Four patients showed a FET positive region only in late FET-PET.
Taking into account the physical differences of PET scanners is important for cross-scanner studies. It was shown in a patient study that BTV may vary between early and late FET-PET, which is important for patient management and needs further investigation.
Pauleit D, Floeth F, Hamacher K, et al.: O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine PET combined with MRI improves the diagnostic assessment of cerebral gliomas. Brain 2005, 128: 678–687. 10.1093/brain/awh399
Herzog H, Tellmann L, Hocke C, et al.: NEMA NU2–2001 guided performance evaluation of four Siemens ECAT PET scanners. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2004, 51: 2662–2669. 10.1109/TNS.2004.835778
Thielemans K, Tsoumpas C, Mustafovic S, et al.: STIR: software for tomographic image reconstruction release 2. Phys. Med. Biol. 2012, 57: 867–883. 10.1088/0031-9155/57/4/867
About this article
Cite this article
Lohmann, P., Herzog, H., Kops, E.R. et al. Adapting MR-BrainPET scans for comparison with conventional PET: experiences with dynamic FET-PET in brain tumours. EJNMMI Phys 1 (Suppl 1), A64 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-7364-1-S1-A64
- Brain Tumour
- Nuclear Medicine
- Computational Mathematic
- Technical Physic
- Patient Study