Skip to main content

Table 4 List of original deep learning methods evaluated on clinical PET data

From: A review of PET attenuation correction methods for PET-MR

Study

Method

Training / validation / testing data† (Tracer)

Region

Reported error (%)

Proposed method

Vendor method

Ribeiro et al. [233]

Generation of template-based μ-maps [168] from UTE images using a three-layer network

4/N.A/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

3.4

N/A

Bradshaw et al. [269]

Generation of 4-class probability maps from T1 and LAVA Flex images using the 3D DeepMedic network

12/6/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Pelvis

 − 1.0 ± 1.3 (lesions)

Dixon: 0.0 ± 6.4

Gong et al. [214]

Generation of pseudo-CTs from Dixon and ZTE images using a 2D U-Net with group convolutional modules

32/8/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

 ~ 2.0 ± 0.5 ^

*DixonSB: ~ 5.5 ± 1.5

ZTE: ~ 4 ± 1.3

Jang et al. [231]

Generation of 3-class from rapidly acquired UTE images using a 2D VGG16 (encoder) and SegNet (decoder)

30 T1 + 6 UTE (transfer learning)/ N.A/ 8

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

0.2 ± 1

N/A

Liu et al. [229]

Generation of 3-class pseudo-CTs from AC PET 2-[18F]FDG images using a 2D VGG16

100/28/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

−0.6 ± 2.0

N/A

Liu et al. [114]

Same as [229] but using a 13-layer VGG16 with T1 images as input

100/28/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

−0.7 ± 1.1

Dixon: −5.8 ± 3.1

Arabi et al. [38]

Generation of 4-class μ-maps from T1 images using the 3D adversarial semantic structure

15/15/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

3.2 ± 3.4 (whole head)

N/A

Blanc-Durand et al. [75]

Generation of pseudo-CTs from ZTE images using a 3D U-Net algorithm

50/43/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

−0.2 ± 5.6

ZTE:2.5

Dong et al. [247]

Generation of pseudo-CTs from NAC PET images using a 3D cycleGAN

80/39/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Whole body

 − 1.1 ± 3.9 (Brain), 10.7 ± 7.7 (Lung), 0.7 ± 8.4 (Heart)

N/A

Hwang et al. [253]

Generation of CT-based μ-maps from MLAA images using a 2D U-Net

60/20/20

(2-[18F]FDG)

Whole body

 − 2.2 ± 1.78 (bone lesions)

1.3 ± 3.3 (soft-tissue lesions)

Dixon: −9.4 ± 5.2

Dixon: −2.9 ± 1.2

Ladefoged et al. [212]

Generation of pseudo-CTs for paediatric data from UTE, echo images and the R2* map using a 3D U-Net

60/19/28 ([18F]FET)

Brain

−0.1

N/A

Shiri et al. [220]

Generation of AC from NAC PET 2-[18F]FDG images using a 2D U-Net algorithm

91/20/18

Brain

 − 0.1 ± 2.14

N/A

Spuhler et al. [226]**

Generation of pseudo-transmission data from a spoiled gradient recalled acquisition using a 2D U-Net

66/11/11 ([11C]WAY-100635) + 10 ([11C]DASB)

Brain

 − 0.5 ± 1.7 ([11C]WAY-100635)

 − 1.5 ± 0.7 ([11C]DASB)

N/A

Torrado-Carvajal et al. [241]

Generation of pseudo-CTs from Dixon images as input to a 2D U-Net algorithm

15/4/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Pelvis

0.3 ± 2.6 (Fat),

 − 0.0 ± 3.0 (soft tissue),

 − 0.9 ± 5.1 (bone)

Dixon: 1.5 ± 6.5

Dixon: −0.3 ± 10.0

Dixon: −25.1 ± 12.7

Arabi et al. [237]

Generation of CT-derived pseudo-μ-maps from PET TOF sinogram data using the 2D HighRes framework

52/16/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

2.9 ± 3.1 (head), 2.0 ± 10.6 (soft tissue), 1.2 ± 10.2 (bone)

N/A

Armanious et al. [259]

Generation of pseudo-CT from NAC PET 2-[18F]FDG images using a 2D GAN framework

100/N.A/25

(2-[18F]FDG)

Whole body

 − 5.6 ± 7.2 (left lung), − 3 ± 11.7 (right lung)

N/A

Dong et al. [248]

Generation of AC from NAC PET images using a 2D cycleGAN framework

25/1 (leave-one-out)/30

(2-[18F]FDG)

Whole body

 − 17.0 ± 12.0 (lung), 2.1 ± 2.5 (heart), 2.8 ± 5.2 (lesions)

N/A

Hu et al. [258]

Generation of pseudo-CT and AC from NAC PET images using a 2D Wasserstein GAN

40/5/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Whole Body

6.4 ± 3.8 (brain), 4.4 ± 3.2 (heart), 4.3 ± 5.4 (lung)

N/A

Ladefoged et al. [215]

Similar to [212] but using DIXON images as input

403 + 5 (transfer learning)/207/104

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

 ~ −0.3

DixonSB: 0.8 ± 2.4

Anaya et al. [303]***

Generation of pseudo-CT from Dixon water images using the (2D) pix2pix framework

9/2/1

(N/A)

Head & neck

2.1^

N/A

Chen et al. [210]

Generation of pseudo-CTs from R1 images as derived from UTE using a residual 3D U-Net

72/18/84

([18F]Florbetapir)

Brain

0.1 ± 0.6

N/A

Choi et al. [225]

Generation of tracer-specific pseudo-μ-map from MLAA images using a 3D U-Net

60/20/20

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

 < 5

N/A

Gong et al. [217]

Same as [214] but using images from a UTE/multi-echo sequence as input

30/5/N.A ([11C]PiB, [18F]MK6240)

Brain

 < 2

N/A

Gong et al. [228]

Generation of the pseudo-CTs from Dixon images using a 3D cycleGAN

28/4/N.A

([18F]FDG)

Brain

 ~ 3

Dixon: ~ 8

Hashimoto et al. [41]*

Generation of pseudo-CTs from NAC PET images using a 2D U-Net algorithm and mixed tracer training data

1091/N.A/70

(6 tracers)

Brain

 − 5.7 ± 5.0 (2-[18F]FDG)

N/A

Kläser et al. [236]

Pseudo-CT generation from T1 & T2 images using HighRes3DNET and imitation learning

16/4/23

(2-[18F]FDG)

Brain

4.04 ± 0.5 ^

N/A

Pozaruk et al. [243]

Generation of pseudo-CTs from Dixon images using a 2D cycleGAN framework

18 /N.A/10

([68 Ga]Ga-PSMA)

Pelvis

2.2 ^

Dixon: 10.3, DixonSB: 8.7

Shiri et al. [305]

Generation of tracer and sight-specific AC from NAC PET images using a 2D U-Net and transfer learning techniques

1110 (2-[18F]FDG) & 855 ([68 Ga]Ga-PSMA)/N.A./95 ([68 Ga]Ga-PSMA)

Whole body

2.72 ± 7.5

N/A

Ahangari et al. [242]

Generation of pseudo-CT from Dixon images using a 3D U-Net

11 (transfer learning)/N.A./15

Whole body

2.1 ± 2.4 (Brain),

 − 4.9 ± 12.1 (lung),

 − 4.0 ± 6.5 (bone)

DixonSB: 2.1 ± 3.2,

DixonSB: −4.3 ± 20.3,

DixonSB: −7 ± 12.4

Arabi et al. [271]

Pseudo-CT generation from in-phase Dixon images using the 2D HighResNet

20/5/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Whole body

 − 3.7 ± 5.5 (lung), 1.1 ± 3.1 (bone), 2.1 ± 3.7 (cerebellum)

N/A

Hwang et al. [306]

Generation of tracer-specific pseudo-μ-map from MLAA images using a 3D U-Net

60/20/20 (2-[18F]FDG)

Whole body

1.2 ± 5.7 (lung lesions),

0.2 ± 3.8 (bone lesions)

N/A

Olin et al. [211]

Generation of pseudo-CTs from Dixon images using a 3D U-Net

800 heads + 17 head & neck (transfer learning)/leave-one-out/10 (2-[18F]FDG)

Head & neck

 − 0.6 ± 2.0 (lesions)

DixonSB: −3.5 ± 4.6

Sari et al. [289]

Air pocket segmentation from Dixon images using a 3D U-Net followed by generation of pseudo-CTs from Dixon images using a second 3D U-Net

30/5/N.A

(2-[18F]FDG)

Pelvis

2.6

DixonSB: 5.1

Toyonaga et al. [255]

Generation of tracer-specific pseudo-μ-map from MLAA images using a 3D U-Net

40/22/73 (2-[18F]FDG)

40/22/36 ([68 Ga]DOTATATE)

40/22/50 ([18F]Fluciclovine)

Whole body

Thorax: − 1.5 ± 2.3

(2-[18F]FDG), 2.2 ± 2.3 ([18F]Dotatate), − 2.9 ± 1.8 ([18F]Fluciclovine)

N/A

Wang et al. [307]

Generation of AC from NAC PET images using a 2D U-Net with deformable transformer layers

21/4/5

(13N-Ammonia)

Thorax

10.1 ± 2.9 (myocardium)

N/A

Shiri et al. [275]

Training of a “global” model for multi-centre trials, by feeding sight-specific trained models to it. AC from NAC PET images using a 2D U-Net are generated

180/60/60

(2-[18F]FDG)

Whole body

-0.1 ± 0.1

N/A

  1. The mean relative error along with the standard deviation (where available) in radiotracer uptake for the whole region is reported unless otherwise specified. CT was used for reconstructing the reference images unless otherwise specified
  2. Number of patients used for training, validating and testing the model
  3. *Dixon Segbone method (DixonSB) [31]
  4. **Transmission data used for reconstructing the reference PET images
  5. ***An atlas method [71] used for reconstructing the reference PET images, ^ relative absolute error is reported, voxel-wise error is reported