Skip to main content

Table 4 Estimated fit parameters for 225Ac

From: Estimation of relative biological effectiveness of 225Ac compared to 177Lu during [225Ac]Ac-PSMA and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA radiopharmaceutical therapy using TOPAS/TOPAS-nBio/MEDRAS

Cell geom.

Intern.

 

\(b_{{{\text{init}}}} , {\text{DSB}}s \, {\text{Gy}}^{ - 1}\)

\(b_{{{\text{repair}}}} , {\text{DSB}}s\, {\text{ Gy}}^{ - 1}\)

1

int.

2D

163.10 ± 1.82

145.36 ± 1.90

1

membr.

2D

160.81 ± 1.94

144.95 ± 1.98

2

int.

2D

161.95 ± 1.81

143.88 ± 1.96

2

membr.

2D

161.97 ± 1.91

144.90 ± 2.04

3

int.

2D

157.35 ± 1.74

137.71 ± 1.75

3

membr.

2D

159.63 ± 2.35

142.29 ± 2.68

4

int.

2D

157.15 ± 2.44

137.76 ± 2.59

4

membr.

2D

163.13 ± 2.37

143.89 ± 2.47

5

int.

2D

160.69 ± 2.36

141.67 ± 2.51

5

membr.

2D

160.12 ± 2.73

142.74 ± 2.84

1

int.

3D

166.60 ± 1.16

152.99 ± 1.23

1

membr.

3D

166.96 ± 1.13

154.34 ± 1.20

2

int.

3D

164.56 ± 1.36

150.75 ± 1.46

2

membr.

3D

167.69 ± 1.17

154.83 ± 1.25

3

int.

3D

169.71 ± 1.32

156.25 ± 1.39

3

membr.

3D

165.86 ± 1.30

152.59 ± 1.36

4

int.

3D

164.95 ± 1.14

150.78 ± 1.21

4

membr.

3D

164.47 ± 1.17

149.65 ± 1.20

5

int.

3D

164.49 ± 1.32

150.94 ± 1.40

5

membr.

3D

165.55 ± 1.34

152.14 ± 1.40

  1. \(b_{{{\text{init}}}}\) and \(b_{{{\text{repair}}}}\) denote \(b_{{{}_{{}}^{225} {\text{Ac}}}}\) defined in Methods for the initial damage and the post-repair damage, rescpectively