Skip to main content

Table 7 Performance comparisons of commercial preclinical SPECT cameras validated with GATE using \({}^{99\text {m}}\)Tc

From: NEMA NU 1-2018 performance characterization and Monte Carlo model validation of the Cubresa Spark SiPM-based preclinical SPECT scanner

Reporting parameter

Spark

X-SPECT

Inveon

HiReSPECT

NanoSPECT

Detection method

SiPM

CZT

PSPMT

PSPMT

PMT

Scintillation crystala

CsI(Na)

N/A

NaI(Tl)

CsI(Na)

NaI(Tl)

Collimatorb

SPH/MPH

SPH/MPH

SPH/MPH

PH

SPH/MPH

Radius of rotation (mm)

28

25

25

25

45

Magnification factor

\(\sim 1\times\)

\(\sim 4\times\)

\(\sim 4\times\)

\(1\times\)

\(\sim 3.5\times\)

Energy window width

30%

20%

20%

N/A

20%

Aperture size (mm)

1.0

1.0

1.0

1.2

1.5

Intrinsic spatial resolution (mm)

0.85

1.5

N/A

N/A

3.2

Intrinsic energy resolution (%)

14.7

5

12.4

19.15

8.7

System resolution (mm)

SPH: 1.87

SPH: 1.02

N/A

2.79

N/A

Sensitivity (cps/MBq)

SPH: 34

MPH: 155

SPH: 38

36–42

SPH: 42

 

MPH: 150

 

MPH: 286

 

MPH: 191

SPECT resolution (mm)

SPH: 1.37

MPH: 0.58

SPH: 1.25

1.7

SPH: 1.27

 

MPH: 1.19

   

MPH: 1.24

References

N/A

[14, 43, 44]

[15, 45,46,47]

[16, 48, 49]

[17, 50]

  1. a CsI(Na): sodium-activated cesium iodide, NaI(Tl): thallium-activated sodium iodide
  2. b SPH: single-pinhole, MPH: multi-pinhole, PH: parallel-hole
  3. N/A: not applicable or not available