Table 2 Image quality assessment using a 5-point scale. The analysis was performed considering the mean score of the four reviewers and the score assigned by each individual reviewer
PET-processed | PET-native | ||
|---|---|---|---|
Mean ± SD (range) | Mean ± SD (range) | p | |
Overall (mean score of the 4 reviewers) | 4.62 ± 0.23 (1-5) | 4.54 ± 0.20 (2-5) | 0.11 |
Reviewer 1 (AI) | 4.73 ± 0.44 (4-5) | 4.65 ± 0.48 (4-5) | |
Reviewer 2 (EP) | 4.55 ± 0.59 (3-5) | 4.38 ± 0.66 (3-5) | |
Reviewer 3 (GP) | 4.29 ± 1.01 (1-5) | 4.31 ± 0.65 (2-5) | |
Reviewer 4 (VA) | 4.90 ± 0.35 (3-5) | 4.80 ± 0.48 (3-5) |