Table 3 Comparison between the doses delivered by Golgi to nucleus for 2 geometrical assumptions: PM models and simplified CSG. The data are listed in increasing order of Golgi volume (Vg)
PM Vg (μm3) | S(N ← G) \( \left[\frac{\mathrm{Gy}}{\mathrm{Bq}\ \mathrm{s}}\right] \) | CSG Vg (μm3) | S(N ← G) \( \left[\frac{\mathrm{Gy}}{\mathrm{Bq}\ \mathrm{s}}\right] \) |
|---|---|---|---|
123 | 1.05E−04 | 110 | 3.67E−05 |
80 | 8.71E−05 | 94 | 3.70E−05 |
68 | 1.05E−04 | 86 | 3.75E−05 |
63 | 1.32E−04 | 78 | 3.60E−05 |
60 | 8.57E−05 | 70 | 4.40E−05 |
54 | 8.12E−05 | 62 | 4.78E−05 |
31 | 6.96E−05 | 54 | 6.32E−05 |
25 | 5.41E−05 | 46 | 6.71E−05 |
24 | 1.22E−04 | 38 | 8.87E−05 |
Average | (9.4±2.5) E−05 | Average | (5.1±1.8) E−05 |