EJNMMI Physics

Table 2 Percent differences in \( \overline{AD} \) when using SKD, SK, and LD compared with MC

From: Comparing voxel-based absorbed dosimetry methods in tumors, liver, lung, and at the liver-lung interface for ⁹⁰Y microsphere selective internal radiation therapy

	SKD vs. MC	SK vs. MC	LD vs. MC
Tumor \( \overline{AD} \)	−0.2 % ± 0.3 %,	1.6 % ± 1.2 %,	0.9 % ± 1.2 %,
Tumor \( \overline{AD} \)	[−1.7 %, 0.0 %]	[−2.6 %, 3.1 %]	[−0.4 %, 4.7 %]
NL \( \overline{AD} \)	−0.3 % ± 0.1 %,	1.5 % ± 0.7 %,	−0.1 % ± 0.5 %,
NL \( \overline{AD} \)	[−0.5 %, −0.1 %]	[−0.6 %, 2.3 %]	[−1.3 %, 0.6 %]
RL \( \overline{AD} \)	19.6 % ± 9.9 %,	−60.2 % ± 3.7 %,	17.4 % ± 9.4 %,
RL \( \overline{AD} \)	[7.3 %, 48.3 %]	[−65.8 %, −52.7 %]	[6.5 %, 45.1 %]

μ ± σ, [min, max] of (100 × (calculation − MC)/MC)

Back to article page