Technical opportunities and challenges in developing total-body PET scanners for mice and rats

EJNMMI Physics

Table 1 Peak noise equivalent count rates (NECRs), system type, and references of scanners shown in Figs. 1 and 2

Name of scanner	Peak NECR (kcps)		System type	References
Name of scanner	Mouse phantom	Rat phantom	System type	References
NanoPET	430	130	PET/CT	[45]
A-PET	~ 500	~ 230	Standalone	[40]
Inveon	1670	590	PET/CT	[43]
Metis	1344	640	PET/CT	[47]
IRIS	185	40	PET/CT	[46]
ClairvivoPET	415 kcps (50 mm ¹⁸F line source)		Standalone	[41]
HiPET	179	63	Standalone	[30]
LabPET-12	362	156	PET/CT	[42]
ClearPET	Unknown	Unknown	PET/CT	[44]
Albira Si PET	486	239	PET/SPECT/CT	[29]
SIAT aPET	324	144	MR-Compatible	[31]
β-CUBE	300	160	PET/CT	[28]
SimPET-X	348	Unknown	MR-Compatible	[13]
quadHIDAC32	67	52	Standalone	[38]
Yamaya’s PET	Unknown	Unknown	Standalone	[21]
Mouse J-PET	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	[48]
Rat J-PET	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	[48]
HS-BGO PET	Unknown	Unknown	MR-Compatible	[49]
H²RS110	Unknown	Unknown	MR-Compatible	[12]
H²RS160	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	[12]
UHS-PET	Unknown	Unknown	Unknown	[50]