Table 3 Comparison of the peak sensitivity of different preclinical PET scanners. Data are taken from [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]
From: NEMA characterization of the SAFIR prototype PET insert
System | Energy win. (keV) | Time win. (ns) | Axial FOV (mm) | Sensitivity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SAFIR | 391–601 | 0.5 | 36 | 1.06 |
SAFIR | 250–650 | 0.5 | 36 | 2.57 |
Hyperion IID | 250–625 | 200 | 96.7 | 4.0 |
NanoScan | 250–750 | 5 | 94 | 8.4 |
MuPET | 350–650 | 3.4 | 116 | 6.35 |
Inveon | 350–625 | 3.4 | 127 | 6.72 |
IRIS | 250–750 | 5.2 | 95 | 8 |
ClearPET | 250–650 | 12 | 110 | 1.87 |
Mosaic HP | 385–665 | 7 | 119 | 1.77 |
LabPET 8TM | 250–650 | 20 | 75 | 1.33 |
microPET R4 | 350–650 | 6 | 78 | 2.4 |
Xtrim-PET | 250–650 | 10 | 50.3 | 2.99 |
Bruker | – | – | 150 | 11.0 |