Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance parameters of the PET component of the PET/CT Vereos with or without an 8 mm PMMA biocontainment tube within the bore defined by NEMA NU2-2012 measurements including energy and timing resolution, spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rates and scatter fractions

From: Impact of a PMMA tube on performances of a Vereos PET/CT system adapted for BSL-3 environment according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard

Parameter

Without tube

With 8 mm tube

Manufacturer guidelines

Energy resolution (%)

11

11.03

≤ 13

Timing resolution (ps)

311.82

312

≤ 390

Spatial resolution (FWHM)

   

 Transverse, 1 cm

4.03 ± 0.11

3.96 ± 0.14

< 4.9

 Transverse, radial, 10 cm

4.59 ± 0.09

4.62 ± 0.09

< 5.5

 Transverse, radial, 20 cm

5.77 ± 0.04

5.8 ± 0.04

< 7.2

 Transverse, tangential, 10 cm

4.33 ± 0.02

4.34 ± 0.03

< 5.5

 Transverse, tangential, 20 cm

4.94 ± 0.05

4.89 ± 0.05

< 7.2

 Axial, 1 cm

4.06 ± 0.46

4.29 ± 0

< 4.9

 Axial, radial, 10 cm

4.29 ± 0.12

4.43 ± 0.10

< 5.5

 Axial, radial, 20 cm

4.64 ± 0.07

4.7 ± 0.13

< 7.2

Sensitivity (cps/GBq)

   

 Centered

6.22

5.21

≥ 5.1

 10 cm Off-centered

6.17

5.34

≥ 5.1

Count rates and scatter fractions

   

 Peak true count rate (kcps)

660 @51.7 kBq/mL

595.59 @51.3 kBq/mL

> 675.000

 Peak NECR rate (kcps)

161,8 @51.75 kBq/mL

173.63 @51.35 kBq/mL

> 148.000

 Location of NECR peak (kBq/mL)

51.75

51.35

> 25.000

 Scatter fraction (%) at low count

31 @0.14 kBq/mL

31,2 @0.14 kBq/mL

 

 Scatter fraction (%) at NECR peak

33.12

33

≤ 35.00

 Max relative count rate error (%)

6.01

5.06

< 12.00

Image quality (%)

   

 10 mm 4:1

59.9

82.9

> 26

 13 mm 4:1

75.4

78.0

> 40

 17 mm 4:1

96.6

83.8

> 50

 22 mm 4:1

90.3

91.4

> 60

 28 mm cold

84.1

79.5

> 68

 37 mm cold

85.4

87.1

> 70

Variability (%)

   

 10 mm 4:1

9.5

8.8

< 11

 13 mm 4:1

7.7

7.3

< 9

 17 mm 4:1

6.1

5.9

< 8

 22 mm 4:1

4.6

4.5

< 8

 28 mm cold

3.3

3.5

< 7

 37 mm cold

2.2

2.8

< 7

 Lung residual

6.5

5.8

≤ 15

  1. Quality image was also evaluated with the percentage contrast for spheres with different diameters, the percentage background variability, and percentage relative lung error for the images. Measured values were compared to recommended values provided by the manufacturer in the Installation Acceptance Test Document