Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of COVs (Coefficients of variation, %) of all spheres among three different correction combinations

From: Impacts of acquisition and reconstruction parameters on the absolute technetium quantification of the cadmium–zinc–telluride-based SPECT/CT system: a phantom study

 

Correction combination

37 mm

28 mm

22 mm

17 mm

13 mm

10 mm

P value

32:1

AC + SC + RR

93.77

92.21

88.01

87.85

85.95

86.64

 
 

AC + RR

74.53

72.91

70.50

71.00

69.76

70.82

 < 0.001a

 

AC + SC

102.96

103.52

101.71

101.53

100.70

100.80

 < 0.001b

16:1

AC + SC + RR

95.09

94.61

89.02

89.62

88.86

85.71

 
 

AC + RR

76.36

75.60

72.28

72.54

70.40

69.06

 < 0.001a

 

AC + SC

96.95

96.33

97.64

97.13

95.44

94.43

0.007b

8:1

AC + SC + RR

97.25

94.93

91.36

90.93

90.74

87.10

 
 

AC + RR

77.98

75.92

73.78

72.54

72.06

69.67

 < 0.001a

 

AC + SC

96.31

93.75

94.79

94.89

95.34

95.60

0.096b

4:1

AC + SC + RR

92.71

88.97

84.03

83.13

82.02

79.55

 
 

AC + RR

73.12

72.69

69.53

68.38

66.97

64.92

 < 0.001a

 

AC + SC

91.77

91.38

91.91

91.49

91.80

94.04

0.026b

  1. Reconstruction parameters: 35 iterations, 20 subsets, no filter; Acquisition parameters: 120 s/frame of acquisition time, 15% energy window; AC, attenuation correction; SC, scatter correction; RR, resolution recovery correction; a, AC + SC + RR vs. AC + RR; b, AC + SC + RR vs. AC + SC