Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of LDM to VSV convolution absorbed dose calculation methods through Dmean,D50% and D2% for patients #1 and #2 and different VOIs. Reconstructions were performed using i3s10-2mm

From: Yttrium-90 quantitative phantom study using digital photon counting PET

Patient, VOI VSV convolution LDM
  \(\overline {D}^{VSV}_{pet}\) \(D^{VSV}_{pet,50\%}\) \(D^{VSV}_{pet,2\%}\) \(\overline {D}^{LDM}_{pet}\) \(D^{LDM}_{pet,50\%}\) \(D^{LDM}_{pet,2\%}\)
#1, WLV 38.1 1.3 242.7 38.5 0.9 263.4
#1, PLV 131.0 112.2 365.7 133.8 111.2 401.4
#1, TV 126.4 109.8 417.1 127.8 104.5 459.5
#1, PNLV 113.9 101.2 270.7 116.9 101.3 305.7
#2, WLV 25.1 5.4 157.8 25.5 3.6 178.1
#2, PLV 61.0 45.4 197.7 62.6 43.7 231.9
#2, TV 49.5 33.4 183.8 50.4 30.0 215.8
#2, PNLV 48.5 30.0 214.1 51.8 30.6 247.9