Skip to main content

Table 3 Fitting results and dependent analysis of SUV vs. BMI for the FDG study (n = 90)

From: Evaluation of SUVlean consistency in FDG and PSMA PET/MR with Dixon-, James-, and Janma-based lean body mass correction

    Mean ± SD CV Slope with Correlation with BMI Significance of correlation with BMI (p) ANOVA (p)
Brain Max bw 20.69 ± 8.86 0.428 0.417 0.173 0.103 p < 0.001
Dixon 13.39 ± 5.77 0.430 0.132 0.067 0.531 0.052
James 15.70 ± 6.59 0.420 0.094 0.032 0.767
Janma 14.68 ± 6.28 0.427 0.128 0.061 0.567
Mean bw 5.72 ± 1.46 0.255 0.115 0.317 0.002 p < 0.001
Dixon 3.71 ± 0.97 0.260 0.037 0.143 0.178 p < 0.001
James 4.34 ±1.04 0.239 0.024 0.078 0.465
Janma 4.05 ± 1.02 0.251 0.033 0.124 0.245
Liver Max bw 1.89 ± 0.37 0.196 0.043 0.536 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Dixon 1.22 ± 0.23 0.187 0.015 0.316 0.002 p < 0.001
James 1.43 ± 0.24 0.165 0.010 0.211 0.046
Janma 1.34 ± 0.25 0.185 0.012 0.254 0.016
Mean bw 1.59 ± 0.28 0.179 0.029 0.454 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Dixon 1.03 ± 0.17 0.165 0.008 0.217 0.04 p < 0.001
James 1.21 ± 0.19 0.159 0.003 0.079 0.459
Janma 1.13 ± 0.20 0.176 0.005 0.143 0.180
Blood Max bw 1.02 ± 0.20 0.192 0.019 0.402 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Dixon 0.66 ± 0.11 0.162 0.005 0.189 0.074 p < 0.001
James 0.77 ± 0.13 0.171 0.002 0.056 0.603
Janma 0.72 ± 0.13 0.186 0.004 0.114 0.283
Mean bw 0.90 ± 0.19 0.207 0.014 0.306 0.003 p < 0.001
Dixon 0.58 ± 0.10 0.176 0.003 0.093 0.382 p < 0.001
James 0.69 ± 0.13 0.189 0.000 − 0.024 0.822
Janma 0.64 ± 0.13 0.197 0.001 0.039 0.714
Muscle Max bw 0.65 ± 0.16 0.253 0.016 0.426 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Dixon 0.42 ± 0.09 0.220 0.006 0.280 0.008 p < 0.001
James 0.49 ± 0.11 0.220 0.005 0.189 0.074
Janma 0.46 ± 0.10 0.227 0.005 0.232 0.028
Mean bw 0.54 ± 0.13 0.237 0.010 0.348 p < 0.001 p < 0.001
Dixon 0.35 ± 0.07 0.196 0.003 0.182 0.086 p < 0.001
James 0.41 ± 0.08 0.207 0.002 0.077 0.468
Janma 0.38 ± 0.08 0.211 0.002 0.126 0.237
  1. SUV standardized uptake value, BMI body mass index, CV coefficient of variation, DXA dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, SD standard deviation, ANOVA analysis of variance