Table 4 Difference in volume and AD/BED metrics at the lesion level when comparing the two segmentation methods and the two realizations of PET-based segmentation
| Â | PS vs MS | PS1 vs PS2 |
|---|---|---|
ΔVolume (cm3) | 0.8 ± 51 [− 336, − 2, 3, 12, 69] | 5 ± 40 [− 78, − 1, 0,4256] |
Absorbed Dose | ||
 ΔMean (Gy) | 30 ± 50 [− 96, 1, 17, 45, 222] | − 6 ± 23 [− 103, − 13, − 0,3,37] |
 ΔD70 (Gy) | 38 ± 61 [− 115, 1, 18, 57, 240] | − 7 ± 23 [− 85, − 10, − 0,4,40] |
 ΔD90(Gy) | 44 ± 68 [−129, 3, 24, 70, 250] | −6 ± 23 [− 84, − 7, 0,3,51] |
BED | ||
 ΔMean (Gy) | 63 ± 142 [− 273, 2, 30, 80, 745] | − 14.7 + −  55 [− 266, − 22, − 1, 7, 67] |
 ΔBED70(Gy) | 76 ± 155 [− 308, 2, 29, 113, 733] | − 13.8 + − 49 [− 197, − 16, − 1, 6, 75] |
 ΔBED90 (Gy) | 79 ± 152 [− 309, 3, 30, 107, 677] | − 11.6 + −  42 [− 170, − 17, 0, 5, 78] |
ΔVolume (%) | 44 ± 100 [− 85, − 27, 18, 99, 382] | 54 ± 253 [− 75, − 10, 1, 25, 1779] |
Absorbed Dose | ||
 ΔMean (%) | 24 ± 36 [− 43, 2, 14, 36, 193] | − 2.5 ± 11 [− 39, − 7, − 0, 2, 21] |
 ΔD70 (%) | 49 ± 72 [− 51, 2, 24, 75, 318] | − 1.9 ± 16 [− 48, − 9, − 0, 4, 39] |
 ΔD90(%) | 93 ± 150 [− 58, 8, 46, 125, 832] | − 0.9 ± 21 [− 52, − 10, 0, 4, 72] |
BED | ||
 ΔMean (%) | 28 ± 42 [− 46, 2, 17, 46, 221] | − 3.0 + − 13 [− 45, − 8, − 0,3,25] |
 ΔBED70(%) | 62 ± 85 [− 53, 2, 31, 105, 345] | − 2.3 + − 18 [− 54, − 12, − 0,5,42] |
 ΔBED90(%) | 117 ± 183 [− 60, 10, 54, 174, 1026] | − 1.2 + − 24 [− 59, − 13, 0,4,89] |