Table 5 Lin’s concordance coefficient ρ c obtained for MBF and MFR comparisons in the three coronary territories (LAD, LCX, RCA)
From: Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters
RP comparisons | Patients without myocardial flow defects (n = 30 territories) | Patients with myocardial flow defects (n = 30 territories) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ρ c (Rest) [95% CI] | ρ c (Stress) [95% CI] | ρ c (MFR) [95% CI] | ρ c (Rest) [95% CI] | ρ c (Stress) [95% CI] | ρ c (MFR) [95% CI] | |
B vs. A | 0.922 [0.873;0.971] | 0.931 [0.888;0.974] | 0.904 [0.838;0.969] | 0.971 [0.951;0.991] | 0.986 [0.976;0.996] | 0.951 [0.917;0.985] |
C vs. A | 0.935 [0.893;0.977] | 0.937 [0.897;0.977] | 0.909 [0.847;0.972] | 0.989 [0.982;0.996] | 0.984 [0.974;0.995] | 0.962 [0.938;0.986] |
D vs. A | 0.897 [0.836;0.959] | 0.949 [0.914;0.984] | 0.957 [0.928;0.987] | 0.973 [0.954;0.991] | 0.968 [0.947;0.989] | 0.975 [0.956;0.993] |
E vs. A | 0.907 [0.843;0.970] | 0.963 [0.939;0.987] | 0.883 [0.808;0.958] | 0.985 [0.975;0.995] | 0.985 [0.974;0.996] | 0.972 [0.952;0.992] |
F vs. A | 0.948 [0.919;0.977] | 0.925 [0.873;0.978] | 0.898 [0.836;0.960] | 0.978 [0.964;0.993] | 0.987 [0.979;0.995] | 0.976 [0.959;0.993] |
G vs. A | 0.889 [0.817;0.961] | 0.947 [0.910;0.985] | 0.876 [0.807;0.845] | 0.977 [0.961;0.993] | 0.978 [0.964;0.993] | 0.944 [0.905;0.983] |
H vs. A | 0.752* [0.618;0.887] | 0.606* [0.446;0.766] | 0.880 [0.805;0.955] | 0.689* [0.522;0.856] | 0.884* [0.811;0.957] | 0.766* [0.627;0.904] |