Skip to main content

Table 4 Lin’s concordance coefficient ρ c obtained for MBF and MFR comparisons in the 17-segment model

From: Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters

RP comparisons All patients (n = 340 segments)
  ρ c (Rest) [95% CI] ρ c (Stress) [95% CI] ρ c (MFR) [95% CI]
B vs. A 0.954 [0.945;0.964] 0.982 [0.978;0.986] 0.938 [0.926;0.950]
C vs. A 0.966 [0.959;0.973] 0.982 [0.978;0.986] 0.945 [0.933;0.956]
D vs. A 0.943 [0.933;0.954] 0.982 [0.978;0.986] 0.971 [0.965;0.977]
E vs. A 0.954 [0.944;0.964] 0.988 [0.985;0.990] 0.931 [0.918;0.944]
F vs. A 0.962 [0.955;0.970] 0.980 [0.976;0.984] 0.941 [0.930;0.952]
G vs. A 0.944 [0.933;0.955] 0.983 [0.980;0.987] 0.926 [0.912;0.939]
H vs. A 0.794* [0.759;0.829] 0.857* [0.833;0.882] 0.893* [0.872;0.914]
  1. *p < 0.05 vs. other comparisons (in italics in same column)