Skip to main content

Table 4 Lin’s concordance coefficient ρ c obtained for MBF and MFR comparisons in the 17-segment model

From: Cardiac PET/CT with Rb-82: optimization of image acquisition and reconstruction parameters

RP comparisons

All patients (n = 340 segments)

 

ρ c (Rest) [95% CI]

ρ c (Stress) [95% CI]

ρ c (MFR) [95% CI]

B vs. A

0.954 [0.945;0.964]

0.982 [0.978;0.986]

0.938 [0.926;0.950]

C vs. A

0.966 [0.959;0.973]

0.982 [0.978;0.986]

0.945 [0.933;0.956]

D vs. A

0.943 [0.933;0.954]

0.982 [0.978;0.986]

0.971 [0.965;0.977]

E vs. A

0.954 [0.944;0.964]

0.988 [0.985;0.990]

0.931 [0.918;0.944]

F vs. A

0.962 [0.955;0.970]

0.980 [0.976;0.984]

0.941 [0.930;0.952]

G vs. A

0.944 [0.933;0.955]

0.983 [0.980;0.987]

0.926 [0.912;0.939]

H vs. A

0.794* [0.759;0.829]

0.857* [0.833;0.882]

0.893* [0.872;0.914]

  1. *p < 0.05 vs. other comparisons (in italics in same column)