Skip to main content

Table 5 Impact of extra-brain activity: comparison of scatter and photopeak counts in human and phantom raw projections

From: [123I]FP-CIT ENC-DAT normal database: the impact of the reconstruction and quantification methods

Camera

Phantom

Human controls

% difference

100*(controls-phantom)/average

SCl/PH

(%)

SCu/PH

(%)

SCl/PH

(%)

SCu/PH

(%)

% Diff for SCl

% Diff for SCu

GE INFINIA2

70.1

53.9

72.9

56.9

3.9

5.4

GE INFINIA1

67.6

56.3

68.9

65.8

1.8

15.7

Philips IRIX (MEGP)

63.5

37.5

61.4

40.3

-3.4

7.2

GE MILLENNIUM

60.1

49.0

65.0

58.4

7.7

17.4

Siemens SYMBIA1

58.1

48.7

61.4

50.3

5.5

3.3

Siemens SYMBIA2

59.3

47.2

57.4

53.9

-3.2

13.2

Siemens ECAM1

59.2

46.1

57.1

49.4

-3.5

6.9

Siemens ECAM2

61.5

48.3

58.6

52.4

-4.9

8.2

Siemens ECAM3

61.6

48.7

63.1

55.1

2.3

12.2

Mediso NUCLINE

66.7

41.3

67.5

51.3

1.3

21.6

Trionix TRIAD1

58.9

41.5

62.0

52.0

5.2

22.6

Trionix TRIAD2

63.3

54.0

67.0

66.3

5.7

20.4

  1. Columns 2-5: total counts in SCl and SCu windows are expressed relatively to photopeak (% of PH) counts. In the last two columns (6, 7), the results for human and phantom data are compared in terms of their percentage difference