Skip to main content

Table 3 S and PPV obtained by the PET-AS methods for 6 spheres modelled with 2 uptake levels

From: A novel phantom technique for evaluating the performance of PET auto-segmentation methods in delineating heterogeneous and irregular lesions

 

S1

S2

S3

S4

S5

S6

 

S

PPV

S

PPV

S

PPV

S

PPV

S

PPV

S

PPV

AT

0.625

0.882

0.771

0.902

0.579

1.000

0.379

1.000

0.443

0.995

0.214

1.000

RG

0.833

0.741

0.833

0.870

0.748

0.976

0.564

1.000

0.562

0.978

0.400

1.000

GCM2

0.583

0.778

0.792

0.884

0.692

0.949

0.546

0.969

0.560

0.978

0.421

1.000

GCM3

0.708

0.739

0.729

0.946

0.495

1.000

0.392

1.000

0.502

0.983

0.346

1.000

GCM4

0.833

0.400

0.875

0.700

0.794

0.914

0.617

0.959

0.715

0.936

0.581

0.994

GCM5

0.917

0.148

0.938

0.484

0.953

0.773

0.780

0.876

0.806

0.850

0.740

0.969

GCM6

0.958

0.096

0.958

0.326

0.991

0.639

0.868

0.764

0.921

0.761

0.845

0.915

GCM7

0.958

0.068

0.979

0.181

1.000

0.495

0.925

0.689

0.964

0.657

0.906

0.870

GCM8

1.000

0.055

1.000

0.119

1.000

0.334

0.952

0.612

0.992

0.558

0.951

0.814

WT

0.750

0.546

1.000

0.533

0.757

0.871

0.608

0.965

0.600

0.884

0.346

0.942