Skip to main content

Table 3 Image score quality for the 10 patients showed significant difference ( p< 0.04) between FDAP and FDVP only

From: Intravenous contrast-enhanced CT can be used for CT-based attenuation correction in clinical 111In-octreotide SPECT/CT

Patient #

Image score

Lesion value (max pixel)

Krenning score

Lesion location

 

LD

FDAP

FDVP

LD

FDAP

FDVP

LD, FDAP, FDVP

 

1

4

4

5

498

516

446

4, 4, 4

Liver

    

135

145

146

3, 3, 3

Lymph Node

2

4

3

4

678

671

661

4, 4, 4

Liver

3

4

3

4

49

46

55

3, 3, 3

Liver

    

158

171

174

3, 3, 3

Lymph Node

4

4

4

4

753

813

790

4, 4, 4

Lymph Node

5

4

4

4

270

320

309

3, 3, 3

Pancreas

6

5

4

4

142

162

168

3, 3, 3

Lymph Node

7

4

4

5

65

67

68

3, 3, 3

Liver

    

543

593

593

4, 4, 4

Lymph Node

8

4

4

4

249

295

290

3, 4, 4

Liver

    

186

186

192

3, 3, 4

Bone

9

4

4

4

131

133

130

3, 3, 3

Liver

    

358

385

385

3, 4, 4

Lymph Node

10

4

4

4

382

410

423

4, 4, 4

Liver

    

89

83

81

3, 3, 3

Lymph Node

Average

4.1 ± 0.3

3.8 ± 0.4

4.2 ± 0.4

293 ± 214

312 ± 226

307 ± 218

4.1, 3.8, 4.2

N/A

  1. Max pixel values for the 16 lesions shows significantly lower values for LD than for FD; p < 0.003 and p < 0.05 for arterial and venous phase, respectively. On the average, LD values are 6% ± 7% and 6% ± 8% lower. For 13 out of 16 lesions, the Krenning score is identical in all the CT phases. In the remaining three lesions (highlighted), the Krenning score differed by no more than one.