EJNMMI Physics

Table 2 NMAE and NRMSE of dose-rate in lesions and healthy livers across 6 test virtual patients, using our framework, and MC and DVK voxel-dosimetry methods

From: 90Y SPECT scatter estimation and voxel dosimetry in radioembolization using a unified deep learning framework

	NMAE (%)			NRMSE (%)
	SPECT w/CNN SC + DblurDoseNet	SPECT w/CNN SC + DVK	SPECT w/CNN SC + MC Dose	SPECT w/CNN SC + DblurDoseNet	SPECT w/CNN SC + DVK	SPECT w/CNN SC + MC Dose
Virtual patient #I
Lesion I (932.1 mL)	6.2	18.3	18.3	27.5	26.3	26.3
Lesion 2 (41.8 mL)	3.0	24.1	24.0	22.3	28.7	28.6
Healthy liver	4.1	18.5	18.4	33.6	36.7	36.7
Virtual patient #2
Lesion I (183.8 mL)	12.2	24.9	24.8	21.4	28.6	28.5
Healthy liver	0.7	17.0	17.0	28.5	30.8	30.8
Virtual patient #3
Lesion I (56.9 mL)	6.5	21.0	21.0	12.7	22.4	22.3
Healthy liver	5.1	17.5	17.5	23.5	25.8	25.8
Virtual patient #4
Lesion I (29.6 mL)	12.4	17.6	17.5	25.3	23.1	23.1
Lesion 2 (27.4 mL)	7.3	26.2	26.2	18.1	28.2	28.2
Lesion 3 (21.0 mL)	10.5	31.6	31.6	17.6	34.4	34.4
Lesion 4 (5.7 mL)	21.7	38.7	38.7	23.7	40.4	40.3
Healthy liver	1.7	16.6	16.6	23.6	24.6	24.6
Virtual patient #5
Lesion I (26.4 mL)	8.8	25.7	25.7	18.0	31.4	31.3
Healthy liver	14.2	21.4	21.6	24.0	27.7	27.7
Virtual patient #6
Lesion I (21.2 mL)	2.8	20.3	20.2	15.4	21.2	21.1
Lesion 2 (22.7 mL)	0.6	19.2	19.2	26.0	22.9	22.9
Lesion 3 (21.7 mL)	11.6	20.8	20.7	13.5	23.8	23.7
Healthy liver	6.5	16.3	16.4	25.0	24.2	24.1

Mumbers in bold represent the best outcomes among the comparisons made within each table

Back to article page