Skip to main content

Table 2 The spatial resolution values of the NEMA point sources in a warm background for the WT-PET and the Quadra-like TB-PET

From: A simulation study of the system characteristics for a long axial FOV PET design based on monolithic BGO flat panels compared with a pixelated LSO cylindrical design

Scanner

Source position (cm)

 

FWHM (mm)

FWTM (mm)

x

y

z

x

y

z

WT-PET

Center

(1, 0, 0)

1.20

1.62

1.30

2.87

4.14

3.06

(10, 0, 0)

1.16

1.90

1.12

2.81

4.83

2.89

(20, 0, 0)

1.17

1.94

1.19

2.60

4.36

2.81

3/8 of AFOV

(1, 0, 39.75)

1.14

2.13

1.24

2.86

5.22

3.20

(10, 0, 39.75)

1.21

2.48

1.29

3.19

7.11

3.06

(20, 0, 39.75)

1.26

2.52

1.05

2.08

5.58

2.08

Center

(0, 1, 0)

1.18

1.75

1.34

2.43

3.79

2.54

(0, 10, 0)

1.22

1.92

1.33

2.54

4.20

2.54

(0, 20, 0)

1.32

2.25

1.41

2.71

7.08

2.71

3/8 of AFOV

(0, 1, 39.75)

1.29

2.24

1.16

2.58

5.71

2.59

(0, 10, 39.75)

1.52

2.71

1.46

2.91

6.54

3.35

(0, 20, 39.75)

1.65

3.36

1.88

3.76

8.18

3.96

Quadra-like TB-PET 322 MRD

Center

(1, 0, 0)

2.55

2.62

2.85

5.68

6.45

7.03

(10, 0, 0)

3.76

3.27

2.95

7.24

7.98

7.78

(20, 0, 0)

5.24

3.97

3.62

10.39

9.39

8.03

3/8 of AFOV

(1, 0, 39.75)

2.09

2.35

2.24

4.76

5.70

4.68

(10, 0, 39.75)

2.78

3.14

2.89

5.85

7.64

5.03

(20, 0, 39.75)

4.63

3.31

3.20

8.61

6.81

5.76

Quadra-like TB-PET 85 MRD

Center

(1, 0, 0)

2.62

2.70

2.72

5.02

5.66

4.82

(10, 0, 0)

2.86

2.72

2.78

6.66

6.43

5.86

(20, 0, 0)

5.24

3.40

2.94

9.27

9.71

5.79

3/8 of AFOV

(1, 0, 39.75)

2.22

2.44

2.40

4.80

5.71

4.84

(10, 0, 39.75

3.31

3.02

2.71

6.35

6.67

5.95

(20, 0, 39.75)

4.29

2.66

2.23

8.55

10.78

5.82